Literature DB >> 18712419

A novel fusionless vertebral physeal device inducing spinal growth modulation for the correction of spinal deformities.

Eliane C Schmid1, Carl-Eric Aubin, Alain Moreau, John Sarwark, Stefan Parent.   

Abstract

Current fusionless scoliosis surgical techniques span the intervertebral disc. This alters the spine stiffness, disc pressure equilibrium and possibly may lead to disc degeneration. A new fusionless physeal device was developed that locally modulates vertebral growth by compressing the physeal ring, while maintaining maximum segmental spinal mobility without spanning the intervertebral disc. This study's objective was to test the feasibility of the device on a small animal model by inducing a scoliotic deformity (inverse approach) while analyzing the growth modifications. This study was conducted on caudal vertebrae of 21 rats (26-day-old) divided into 3 groups: (1) "experimental" (n = 11) with 4 instrumented vertebrae, (2) sham (n = 5) and (3) control (n = 5). Radiographs were taken at regular intervals during the 7-week experimental period. Tissues were embedded in methyl metacrylate (MMA), prepared by the cutting/grinding method, and then stained (Toluidine blue). The discs physiological alterations were qualitatively assessed and classified by inspection of the histological sections. A mean maximum Cobb angle of 30 masculine (+/-6 masculine) and a mean maximum vertebral wedge angle of 10 masculine (+/-3 masculine) were obtained between the 23rd and 35th day postoperative in the subgroup that underwent a long-term response from the device. The sham group underwent no growth alterations when compared to the control group. Descriptive histological analyses of the operated segments showed that 69% had no alterations to the intervertebral disc. This study presents experimental evidence that the device induces a significant and controlled wedging of the vertebrae while maintaining regular flexibility. In most discs, there were no visible morphological alterations induced. Further analysis of the discs and testing of this device on a larger animal is recommended with the long-term objective of developing an early treatment of progressive idiopathic scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712419      PMCID: PMC2556471          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0723-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  1990 Volvo Award in experimental studies. Anulus tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. An experimental study using an animal model.

Authors:  O L Osti; B Vernon-Roberts; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Modulation of vertebral and tibial growth by compression loading: diurnal versus full-time loading.

Authors:  Ian A Stokes; Jodie Gwadera; Abigail Dimock; Cornelia E Farnum; David D Aronsson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Progression of vertebral wedging in an asymmetrically loaded rat tail model.

Authors:  P L Mente; I A Stokes; H Spence; D D Aronsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Physiological mechanisms adopted by chondrocytes in regulating longitudinal bone growth in rats.

Authors:  E B Hunziker; R K Schenk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Mechanical modulation of vertebral body growth. Implications for scoliosis progression.

Authors:  I A Stokes; H Spence; D D Aronsson; N Kilmer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Different bone growth rates are associated with changes in the expression pattern of types II and X collagens and collagenase 3 in proximal growth plates of the rat tibia.

Authors:  J Alvarez; M Balbín; F Santos; M Fernández; S Ferrando; J M López
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Vertebral body stapling procedure for the treatment of scoliosis in the growing child.

Authors:  Randal R Betz; Linda P D'Andrea; M J Mulcahey; Ross S Chafetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Three-dimensional analysis of 2 fusionless scoliosis treatments: a flexible ligament tether versus a rigid-shape memory alloy staple.

Authors:  John T Braun; Ephraim Akyuz; Hunt Udall; James W Ogilvie; Darrel S Brodke; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Melatonin signaling dysfunction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Alain Moreau; Da Shen Wang; Steve Forget; Bouziane Azeddine; Debora Angeloni; Franco Fraschini; Hubert Labelle; Benoît Poitras; Charles-Hilaire Rivard; Guy Grimard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Collagens in the injured porcine intervertebral disc.

Authors:  E Kääpä; S Holm; X Han; T Takala; V Kovanen; H Vanharanta
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  9 in total

1.  Does removing the spinal tether in a porcine scoliosis model result in persistent deformity? A pilot study.

Authors:  Ashish Patel; Frank Schwab; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Jean Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biomechanical comparison of fusionless growth modulation corrective techniques in pediatric scoliosis.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Spinal growth modulation using a novel intravertebral epiphyseal device in an immature porcine model.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; Yaroslav Wakula; John F Sarwark; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The impact of a corrective tether on a scoliosis porcine model: a detailed 3D analysis with a 20 weeks follow-up.

Authors:  Bertrand Moal; Frank Schwab; Jason Demakakos; Renaud Lafage; Paul Riviere; Ashish Patel; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Coronal plane segmental flexibility in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessed by fulcrum-bending radiographs.

Authors:  Carol-Claudius Hasler; Fritz Hefti; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Optical coherence tomography for the identification of musculoskeletal structures of the spine: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kathy Beaudette; Mathias Strupler; Fouzi Benboujja; Stefan Parent; Carl-Eric Aubin; Caroline Boudoux
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  In vivo dynamic compression has less detrimental effect than static compression on newly formed bone of a rat caudal vertebra.

Authors:  A Benoit; T Mustafy; I Londono; G Grimard; C-E Aubin; I Villemure
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.041

8.  Development of Novel Animal Model for Studying Scoliosis Using a Noninvasive Method and Its Validation through Gene-Expression Analysis.

Authors:  Rajkiran Reddy Banala; Satish Kumar Vemuri; Murahari Penkulinti; Gurava Reddy Av; Subbaiah Gpv
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-18

9.  Mechanobiological analysis of porcine spines instrumented with intra-vertebral staples.

Authors:  Alejandra Mejia Jaramillo; Carl-Éric Aubin; Bahe Hachem; Irene Londono; Juliette Pelletier; Stefan Parent; Isabelle Villemure
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.041

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.