Literature DB >> 20186443

Coronal plane segmental flexibility in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessed by fulcrum-bending radiographs.

Carol-Claudius Hasler1, Fritz Hefti, Philippe Büchler.   

Abstract

Knowledge about segmental flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is crucial for a better biomechanical understanding, particularly for the development of fusionless, growth-guiding techniques. Currently, there is lack of data in this field. The objective of this study was, therefore, to compute segmental flexibility indices (standing angle minus corrected angle/standing angle). We compared segmental disc angles in 76 preoperative sets of standing and fulcrum-bending radiographs of thoracic curves (paired, two-tailed t tests, p < 0.05). The mean standing Cobb angle was 59.7 degrees (range 41.3 degrees -95 degrees ) and the flexibility index of the curve was 48.6% (range 16.6-78.8%). The disc angles showed symmetric periapical distribution with significant decrease (all p values <0.0001) for every cephalad (+) and caudad (-) level change. The periapical levels +1 and -1 wedged at 8.3 degrees and 8.7 degrees (range 3.5 degrees -14.8 degrees ), respectively. All angles were significantly smaller on the-bending views (p values <0.0001). We noted mean periapical flexibility indices of 46% (+1), 49% (-1), 57% (+2) and 81% (-2), which were significantly less (p < 0.001) than for the group of remote levels 105% (+3), 149% (-3), 231% (+4) and 300% (-4). The discal and bony wedging was 60 and 40%, respectively, and mean values 35 degrees and 24 degrees (p < 0.0001). Their relationship with the Cobb angle showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.56 and 0.45). Functional, radiographic analysis of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis revealed significant, homogenous segmental tethering confined to four periapical levels. Future research will aim at in vivo segmental measurements in three planes under defined load to provide in-depth data for novel therapeutic strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186443      PMCID: PMC2899966          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1320-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Preoperative planning simulator for spinal deformity surgeries.

Authors:  C E Aubin; H Labelle; C Chevrefils; G Desroches; J Clin; A Boivin M Eng
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Predictors of flexibility and pain patterns in thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Vedat Deviren; Sigurd Berven; Frank Kleinstueck; James Antinnes; Jason A Smith; Serena S Hu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: suspension versus side-bending radiography.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Lamarre; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle; Carl-Eric Aubin; Julie Joncas; Anne Cabral; Yvan Petit
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The use of fulcrum bending radiographs in anterior thoracic scoliosis correction: a consecutive series of 90 patients.

Authors:  Douglas Hay; Maree T Izatt; Clayton J Adam; Robert D Labrom; Geoffrey N Askin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Traction versus supine side-bending radiographs in determining flexibility: what factors influence these techniques?

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Noriaki Kawakami; Yuji Nishiwaki; Manabu Goto; Taichi Tsuji; Tetsuya Obara; Shiro Imagama; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A novel fusionless vertebral physeal device inducing spinal growth modulation for the correction of spinal deformities.

Authors:  Eliane C Schmid; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; John Sarwark; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Growth of the thoracic spine in congenital scoliosis after expansion thoracoplasty.

Authors:  Robert M Campbell; Anna K Hell-Vocke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  High pressures and asymmetrical stresses in the scoliotic disc in the absence of muscle loading.

Authors:  Adam R Meir; Jeremy C T Fairbank; Deborah A Jones; Donal S McNally; Jill P G Urban
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2007-02-24

10.  Differential wedging of vertebral body and intervertebral disc in thoracic and lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - A cross sectional study in 150 patients.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Seung Woo Suh; Hae-Ryong Song; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Hak-Jun Kim; Chetna H Modi
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2008-08-13
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical investigation and imaging.

Authors:  Daniel Studer
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 2.  Pathogenesis and biomechanics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Authors:  Fritz Hefti
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Axial suspension test to assess pre-operative spinal flexibility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Philippe Büchler; Marcelo Elias de Oliveria; Daniel Studer; Steffen Schumann; Guoyan Zheng; Jacques Schneider; Carol C Hasler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health.

Authors:  Vicente Gilsanz; Tishya A L Wren; Skorn Ponrartana; Stefano Mora; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  The effect of scoliotic deformity on spine kinematics in adolescents.

Authors:  Sarah Galvis; Douglas Burton; Brandon Barnds; John Anderson; Richard Schwend; Nigel Price; Sara Wilson; Elizabeth Friis
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-10-25

6.  Characteristics of Cobb angle distribution in the main thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A retrospective controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Jianping Fan; Hui Shen; Changwei Yang; Yuanyuan Chen; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Three-dimensional vertebral wedging in mild and moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Sophie-Anne Scherrer; Mickaël Begon; Alberto Leardini; Christine Coillard; Charles-Hilaire Rivard; Paul Allard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Jianping Fan; Yuanyuan Chen; Changwei Yang; Gengwu Li; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Prediction of Scoliosis Curve Correction Using Pedicle Screw Constructs in AIS: A Comparison of Fulcrum Bend Radiographs and Traction Radiographs Under General Anesthesia.

Authors:  Devi Prakash Tokala; Ian W Nelson; Jwalant S Mehta; Roy Powell; Sean Grannum; M John Hutchinson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-03-26

10.  The radiographic parameter risk factors of rapid curve progression in Lenke 5 and 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhikun Li; Gengwu Li; Chao Chen; Yifan Li; Changwei Yang; Ming Li; Wei Xu; Xiaodong Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.