Literature DB >> 15607892

Modulation of vertebral and tibial growth by compression loading: diurnal versus full-time loading.

Ian A Stokes1, Jodie Gwadera, Abigail Dimock, Cornelia E Farnum, David D Aronsson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether the amount of endochondral growth response to mechanical compression and the underlying growth mechanism differed with night-time or day-time loading, relative to full-time loading.
METHODS: Mechanical compression (nominally 0.1 MPa stress) was applied across tibial and tail vertebral growth plates of growing Sprague-Dawley rats. Four groups of animals (five per group) were used: 24/24 h (full-time loading); 12/24 h (day-loading); 12/24 h (night-loading); and 0/24 h (sham instrumented). Contralateral tibiae and adjacent vertebrae served as within-animal controls. The animals were euthanized after eight days. Growth plates were processed for quantitative histology to measure 24-h growth, total and BrdU-positive proliferative zone chondrocyte counts, and hypertrophic chondrocytic enlargement in the growth direction.
RESULTS: Growth as a percentage of within-animal control averaged 82% (full-time); 93% (day-loading); 90% (night-loading); 100% (sham) for vertebrae. For proximal tibiae it averaged 70% (full-time); 84% (day-loading); 86% (night-loading); 89% (sham). Reduced amount of hypertrophic chondrocytic enlargement explained about half of this effect in full-time loaded growth plates, but was not significantly altered in half-time loaded growth plates. The remaining variation in growth was apparently explained by reduced total numbers of proliferative zone chondrocytes. These findings indicate that sustained compression loading suppressed growth more than intermittent loading at both anatomical locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15607892     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  17 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of Long Bone Growth in Vertebrates; It Is Time to Catch Up.

Authors:  Alberto Roselló-Díez; Alexandra L Joyner
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Alterations in the growth plate associated with growth modulation by sustained compression or distraction.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Katherine C Clark; Cornelia E Farnum; David D Aronsson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Modulation of neonatal growth plate development by ex vivo intermittent mechanical stress.

Authors:  Hasan Othman; Eugene J Thonar; Jeremy J Mao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Mechanobiological bone growth: comparative analysis of two biomechanical modeling approaches.

Authors:  Hui Lin; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Isabelle Villemure
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Elbow loading promotes longitudinal bone growth of the ulna and the humerus.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Immunolocalisation of fibrillin microfibrils in the calf metacarpal and vertebral growth plate.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Jill Urban
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  The effect of mechanical stretch stress on the differentiation and apoptosis of human growth plate chondrocytes.

Authors:  Keming Sun; Fangna Liu; Junjian Wang; Zhanhao Guo; Zejuan Ji; Manye Yao
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.416

8.  Nonfusion treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by growth modulation and remodeling.

Authors:  David D Aronsson; Ian A F Stokes
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Endochondral growth in growth plates of three species at two anatomical locations modulated by mechanical compression and tension.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; David D Aronsson; Abigail N Dimock; Valerie Cortright; Samantha Beck
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Analysis and simulation of progressive adolescent scoliosis by biomechanical growth modulation.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.