Literature DB >> 8727190

Mechanical modulation of vertebral body growth. Implications for scoliosis progression.

I A Stokes1, H Spence, D D Aronsson, N Kilmer.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The authors developed a rat-tail model to investigate the hypothesis that vertebral wedging during growth in progressive spinal deformities results from asymmetric loading in a "vicious cycle."
OBJECTIVES: To document growth curves with axial compression or distraction applied to tail vertebrae to determine whether compression load slows growth and distraction accelerates it. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Progression of skeletal deformity during growth is believed to be governed by the Hueter-Volkmann law, but there is conflicting evidence to support this idea.
METHODS: Twenty-eight 6-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to one of three groups: compression loading, distraction loading, or sham (apparatus applied without loading). Under general anesthesia, two 0.7-mm diameter stainless steel percutaneous pins were used to transfix each of two vertebrae. The pins were glued to 25-mm diameter external ring fixators. Springs (load rate, 35 g/mm) were installed on three stainless steel threaded rods that were passed through holes in each ring and compressed with nuts to apply compression or distraction forces between 25-75% of bodyweight. Vertebral growth rates in microns/day were measured by digitizing the length of the vertebrae images in radiographs taken 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 weeks later.
RESULTS: The loaded vertebrae grew at 68% of control rate for compressed vertebrae and at 114% for distracted vertebrae. (Differences statistically significant, P < 0.01 by analysis of variance.) For the compressed vertebrae, the pinned vertebrae, which were loaded at one of their two growth cartilages, grew at a reduced rate (85%), although this effect was not apparent for the distraction animals.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm that vertebral growth is modulated by loading, according to the Hueter-Volkmann principle. The quantification of this relationship will permit more rational design of conservative treatment of spinal deformity during the adolescent growth spurt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8727190     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199605150-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  77 in total

1.  Biomechanical modelling of growth modulation following rib shortening or lengthening in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  J Carrier; C E Aubin; I Villemure; H Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Fusionless procedures for the management of early-onset spine deformities in 2011: what do we know?

Authors:  Behrooz A Akbarnia; Robert M Campbell; Alain Dimeglio; Jack M Flynn; Gregory J Redding; Paul D Sponseller; Michael G Vitale; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Does removing the spinal tether in a porcine scoliosis model result in persistent deformity? A pilot study.

Authors:  Ashish Patel; Frank Schwab; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Jean Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Treatment of early onset scoliosis : How far can we go?].

Authors:  D Studer; C C Hasler; A Schulze
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Characteristic morphological patterns within adolescent idiopathic scoliosis may be explained by mechanical loading.

Authors:  Benedikt Schlager; Florian Krump; Julius Boettinger; Frank Niemeyer; Michael Ruf; Sebastian Kleiner; Meinrad Beer; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Significance of the mechanical environment during regeneration of the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Stephan Zeiter; Nick Bishop; Keita Ito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Vertebral height growth predominates over intervertebral disc height growth in adolescents with scoliosis.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Luke Windisch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Biomechanical comparison of fusionless growth modulation corrective techniques in pediatric scoliosis.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 9.  Animal models for scoliosis research: state of the art, current concepts and future perspective applications.

Authors:  Jean Ouellet; Thierry Odent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Growth modulation and remodeling by means of posterior tethering technique for correction of early-onset scoliosis with thoracolumbar kyphosis.

Authors:  Alaaeldin A Ahmad; Loai Aker; Yahia Hanbali; Aesha Sbaih; Zaher Nazzal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.