Literature DB >> 18711180

Systems pathology approach for the prediction of prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.

Michael J Donovan1, Stefan Hamann, Mark Clayton, Faisal M Khan, Marina Sapir, Valentina Bayer-Zubek, Gerardo Fernandez, Ricardo Mesa-Tejada, Mikhail Teverovskiy, Victor E Reuter, Peter T Scardino, Carlos Cordon-Cardo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy, no current personalized tools predict clinical failure (CF; metastasis and/or androgen-independent disease). We developed such a tool through integration of clinicopathologic data with image analysis and quantitative immunofluorescence of prostate cancer tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospectively designed algorithm was applied retrospectively to a cohort of 758 patients with clinically localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. A model predicting distant metastasis and/or androgen-independent recurrence was derived from features selected through supervised multivariate learning. Performance of the model was estimated using the concordance index (CI).
RESULTS: We developed a predictive model using a training set of 373 patients with 33 CF events. The model includes androgen receptor (AR) levels, dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade, lymph node involvement, and three quantitative characteristics from hematoxylin and eosin staining of prostate tissue. The model had a CI of 0.92, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 91% for predicting CF within 5 years after prostatectomy. Model validation on an independent cohort of 385 patients with 29 CF events yielded a CI of 0.84, sensitivity of 84%, and specificity of 85%. High levels of AR predicted shorter time to castrate prostate-specific antigen increase after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).
CONCLUSION: The integration of clinicopathologic variables with imaging and biomarker data (systems pathology) resulted in a highly accurate tool for predicting CF within 5 years after prostatectomy. The data support a role for AR signaling in clinical progression and duration of response to ADT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18711180     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  25 in total

Review 1.  Systems pathology: a critical review.

Authors:  Jose Costa
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Predictive models for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

3.  Genome-wide detection of allelic genetic variation to predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy among prostate cancer patients using an exome SNP chip.

Authors:  Jong Jin Oh; Seunghyun Park; Sang Eun Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Sangchul Lee; Hak Min Lee; Jung Keun Lee; Jin-Nyoung Ho; Sungroh Yoon; Seok-Soo Byun
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Biopsy-Based 8-Protein Prostate Cancer Prognostic Assay to Optimize Treatment Decision Making in Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 Early Stage Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Joshua A Roth; Scott D Ramsey; Josh J Carlson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-10-19

5.  Cross-species regulatory network analysis identifies a synergistic interaction between FOXM1 and CENPF that drives prostate cancer malignancy.

Authors:  Alvaro Aytes; Antonina Mitrofanova; Celine Lefebvre; Mariano J Alvarez; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Tian Zheng; James A Eastham; Anuradha Gopalan; Kenneth J Pienta; Michael M Shen; Andrea Califano; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Implementation of a Precision Pathology Program Focused on Oncology-Based Prognostic and Predictive Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael J Donovan; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Molecular preservation by extraction and fixation, mPREF: a method for small molecule biomarker analysis and histology on exactly the same tissue.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Shuster; Raymond S Lance; Dean A Troyer
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-12-21

8.  Dual role of FoxA1 in androgen receptor binding to chromatin, androgen signalling and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Biswajyoti Sahu; Marko Laakso; Kristian Ovaska; Tuomas Mirtti; Johan Lundin; Antti Rannikko; Anna Sankila; Juha-Pekka Turunen; Mikael Lundin; Juho Konsti; Tiina Vesterinen; Stig Nordling; Olli Kallioniemi; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Olli A Jänne
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Predicting and replacing the pathological Gleason grade with automated gland ring morphometric features from immunofluorescent prostate cancer images.

Authors:  Faisal M Khan; Richard Scott; Michael Donovan; Gerardo Fernandez
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-02-28

10.  Molecular processes leading to aberrant androgen receptor signaling and castration resistance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rong Hu; Samuel R Denmeade; Jun Luo
Journal:  Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.