Literature DB >> 26482553

Cost-Effectiveness of a Biopsy-Based 8-Protein Prostate Cancer Prognostic Assay to Optimize Treatment Decision Making in Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 Early Stage Prostate Cancer.

Joshua A Roth1, Scott D Ramsey1, Josh J Carlson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients with Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 early stage prostate cancer receive invasive treatment but likely derive little or no benefit. A novel 8-protein prognostic assay generates a risk score at time of biopsy that is predictive of prostate cancer aggressiveness and can inform treatment decisions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using the assay to inform treatment decisions compared with usual care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We developed a simulation model to estimate quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and cost outcomes for the 8-protein assay and usual care strategies. Risk classification outcomes, treatment distributions, costs, health state utilities, and mortality rates were derived from the assay's validation study and the peer-reviewed literature. Outcomes included incremental QALYs, costs, and cost-effectiveness ratios. We conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate the most influential inputs and to explore joint uncertainty in outcomes, respectively.
RESULTS: The 8-protein assay strategy resulted in 0.04 more QALY and $700 less in costs compared with usual care (and thus was "dominant"). The cost-effectiveness of the assay strategy was most sensitive to the assay cost, the active surveillance health state utility, and the proportion of low-risk patients receiving active surveillance (vs. treatment) in usual care. In the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the assay strategy decreased cost and increased QALYs in 86.9% and 58.3% of simulations, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Assuming that ongoing prospective studies support the results of retrospective validation studies, the 8-protein prognostic assay strategy for prostate cancer is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to usual guideline-based care in biopsy Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 early stage prostate cancer. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assay; Cost-effectiveness; Economic; Prostate cancer; Proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26482553      PMCID: PMC4679086          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  31 in total

1.  Evaluating quality-adjusted life years: estimation of the health utility index (HUI2) from the SF-36.

Authors:  M B Nichol; N Sengupta; D R Globe
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Utilities and quality-adjusted life years.

Authors:  G W Torrance; D Feeny
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Incorporation of uncertainty in health economic modelling studies.

Authors:  Anthony O'Hagan; Christopher McCabe; Ron Akehurst; Alan Brennan; Andrew Briggs; Karl Claxton; Elisabeth Fenwick; Dennis Fryback; Mark Sculpher; David Spiegelhalter; Andrew Willan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Gene expression profiling and breast cancer care: what are the potential benefits and policy implications?

Authors:  Nina Oestreicher; Scott D Ramsey; Hannah M Linden; Jeannine S McCune; Laura J van't Veer; Wylie Burke; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Quality-adjusted life-years. Ethical implications for physicians and policymakers.

Authors:  J La Puma; E F Lawlor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Development and clinical validation of an in situ biopsy-based multimarker assay for risk stratification in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter Blume-Jensen; David M Berman; David L Rimm; Michail Shipitsin; Mathew Putzi; Thomas P Nifong; Clayton Small; Sibgat Choudhury; Teresa Capela; Louis Coupal; Christina Ernst; Aeron Hurley; Alex Kaprelyants; Hua Chang; Eldar Giladi; Julie Nardone; James Dunyak; Massimo Loda; Eric A Klein; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Mathieu Latour; Jonathan I Epstein; Philip Kantoff; Fred Saad
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Do oncologists believe new cancer drugs offer good value?

Authors:  Eric Nadler; Ben Eckert; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006-02

9.  Systems pathology approach for the prediction of prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael J Donovan; Stefan Hamann; Mark Clayton; Faisal M Khan; Marina Sapir; Valentina Bayer-Zubek; Gerardo Fernandez; Ricardo Mesa-Tejada; Mikhail Teverovskiy; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening and treatment with hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene, or alendronate.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Thomas J Hoerger; John S Wittenborn; Deborah A Galuska; Jaya K Rao
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Optimal Use of Tumor-Based Molecular Assays for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Soum D Lokeshwar; Jamil S Syed; Daniel Segal; Syed N Rahman; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Perceived barriers to the adoption of active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis of community and academic urologists.

Authors:  Shellie D Ellis; Soohyun Hwang; Emily Morrow; Kim S Kimminau; Kelly Goonan; Laurie Petty; Edward Ellerbeck; J Brantley Thrasher
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Health Economic Evidence for Liquid- and Tissue-based Molecular Tests that Inform Decisions on Prostate Biopsies and Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Koen Degeling; Amanda Pereira-Salgado; Niall M Corcoran; Paul C Boutros; Peter Kuhn; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-03-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.