Literature DB >> 19918337

Predictive models for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

William T Lowrance1, Peter T Scardino.   

Abstract

Accurate risk assessment is of paramount importance to newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients and their physicians. Risk prediction models help identify those at high (or low) risk of disease progression and guide discussions about prognosis and treatment. Widely used, well-validated prediction tools are based on standard, readily available clinical and pathologic parameters, but do not include biomarkers, some of which may have an important role in predicting prognosis or determining therapeutic options. A new approach, known as systems pathology, may improve the accuracy of traditional prediction methods and provide patients with a more personalized risk assessment of clinically relevant outcomes. The ultimate goal of prediction models is to improve medical decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological marker; Nomogram; Prognosis; Prostate cancer; Statistical model

Year:  2009        PMID: 19918337      PMCID: PMC2777059     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  40 in total

1.  Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Patrick C Walsh; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Ohori; Michael W Kattan; Hideshige Koh; Norio Maru; Kevin M Slawin; Shahrokh Shariat; Masatoshi Muramoto; Victor E Reuter; Thomas M Wheeler; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Cancer statistics, 2008.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Taylor Murray; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Nomogram incorporating PSA level to predict cancer-specific survival for men with clinically localized prostate cancer managed without curative intent.

Authors:  Michael W Kattan; Jack Cuzick; Gabrielle Fisher; Daniel M Berney; Tim Oliver; Christopher S Foster; Henrik Møller; Victor Reuter; Paul Fearn; James Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Improved prediction of prostate cancer recurrence through systems pathology.

Authors:  Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Angeliki Kotsianti; David A Verbel; Mikhail Teverovskiy; Paola Capodieci; Stefan Hamann; Yusuf Jeffers; Mark Clayton; Faysal Elkhettabi; Faisal M Khan; Marina Sapir; Valentina Bayer-Zubek; Yevgen Vengrenyuk; Stephen Fogarsi; Olivier Saidi; Victor E Reuter; Howard I Scher; Michael W Kattan; Fernando J Bianco; Thomas M Wheeler; Gustavo E Ayala; Peter T Scardino; Michael J Donovan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Systems pathology approach for the prediction of prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael J Donovan; Stefan Hamann; Mark Clayton; Faisal M Khan; Marina Sapir; Valentina Bayer-Zubek; Gerardo Fernandez; Ricardo Mesa-Tejada; Mikhail Teverovskiy; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Preoperative and postoperative nomograms incorporating surgeon experience for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Changhong Yu; Fernando J Bianco; Angel M Cronin; James A Eastham; Eric A Klein; Alwyn M Reuther; Jose Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  13 in total

1.  Utility of preoperative 3 Tesla pelvic phased-array multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion of prostate cancer and its impact on surgical margin status: Experience at a Canadian academic tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Taehyoung Lee; Jen Hoogenes; Ian Wright; Edward D Matsumoto; Bobby Shayegan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Association of genetic and non-genetic risk factors with the development of prostate cancer in Malaysian men.

Authors:  Khamsigan Munretnam; Livy Alex; Nurul Hanis Ramzi; Jagdish Kaur Chahil; I S Kavitha; Nikman Adli Nor Hashim; Say Hean Lye; Sharmila Velapasamy; Lian Wee Ler
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  Differentiation of lethal and non lethal prostate cancer: PSA and PSA isoforms and kinetics.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  The context of prostate cancer genomics in personalized medicine.

Authors:  Yanling Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Bone marrow minimal residual disease was an early response marker and a consistent independent predictor of survival after anti-GD2 immunotherapy.

Authors:  Nai-Kong V Cheung; Irina Ostrovnaya; Deborah Kuk; Irene Y Cheung
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging improves the prediction of tumor staging in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  B Valentin; L Schimmöller; T Ullrich; M Klingebiel; D Demetrescu; L M Sawicki; J Lakes; D Mally; M Quentin; I Esposito; P Albers; G Antoch; C Arsov
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01-16

7.  A tri-marker proliferation index predicts biochemical recurrence after surgery for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sameer Malhotra; Jacques Lapointe; Keyan Salari; John P Higgins; Michelle Ferrari; Kelli Montgomery; Matt van de Rijn; James D Brooks; Jonathan R Pollack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of digital image analysis and visual scoring of KI-67 in prostate cancer prognosis after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Patrice Desmeules; Hélène Hovington; Molière Nguilé-Makao; Caroline Léger; André Caron; Louis Lacombe; Yves Fradet; Bernard Têtu; Vincent Fradet
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Distinct ERG rearrangement prevalence in prostate cancer: higher frequency in young age and in low PSA prostate cancer.

Authors:  G Schaefer; J-M Mosquera; R Ramoner; K Park; A Romanel; E Steiner; W Horninger; J Bektic; M Ladurner-Rennau; M A Rubin; F Demichelis; H Klocker
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Diagnostic and prognostic utility of a DNA hypermethylated gene signature in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liang Kee Goh; Natalia Liem; Aadhitthya Vijayaraghavan; Gengbo Chen; Pei Li Lim; Kae-Jack Tay; Michelle Chang; John Soon Wah Low; Adita Joshi; Hong Hong Huang; Emarene Kalaw; Puay Hoon Tan; Wen-Son Hsieh; Wei Peng Yong; Joshi Alumkal; Hong Gee Sim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.