Literature DB >> 28331890

Predicting and replacing the pathological Gleason grade with automated gland ring morphometric features from immunofluorescent prostate cancer images.

Faisal M Khan1, Richard Scott1, Michael Donovan1, Gerardo Fernandez1.   

Abstract

The Gleason grade is the most common architectural and morphological assessment of prostate cancer severity and prognosis. There have been numerous algorithms developed to approximate and duplicate the Gleason scoring system, mostly developed in standard H&E brightfield microscopy. Immunofluorescence (IF) image analysis of tissue pathology has recently been proven to be robust in developing prognostic assessments of disease, particularly in prostate cancer. We leverage a method of segmenting gland rings in IF images for predicting the pathological Gleason, both the clinical and the image specific grades, which may not necessarily be the same. We combine these measures with nuclear specific characteristics. In 324 images from 324 patients, our individual features correlate well univariately with the Gleason grades and in a multivariate setting have an accuracy of 85% in predicting the Gleason grade. Additionally, these features correlate strongly with clinical progression outcomes [concordance index (CI) of 0.89], significantly outperforming the clinical Gleason grades (CI of 0.78). Finally, in multivariate models for multiple prostate cancer progression endpoints, replacing the Gleason with these features results in equivalent or improved performances. This work presents the first assessment of morphological gland unit features from IF images for predicting the Gleason grade, and even replacing it in prostate cancer prognostics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason; biomarkers; glandular; immunofluorescence; morphology; prostate cancer

Year:  2017        PMID: 28331890      PMCID: PMC5331028          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.021103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  10 in total

1.  Value of quantitative pathological variables as prognostic factors in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  M Brinkhuis; J P Baak; G A Meijer; P J van Diest; O Mogensen; P Bichel; J P Neijt
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Syntactic structure analysis in invasive breast cancer: analysis of reproducibility, biologic background, and prognostic value.

Authors:  P J van Diest; J C Fleege; J P Baak
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Gland ring morphometry for prostate cancer prognosis in multispectral immunofluorescence images.

Authors:  Richard Scott; Faisal M Khan; Jack Zeineh; Michael Donovan; Gerardo Fernandez
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

4.  Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images.

Authors:  Patrick Leo; George Lee; Natalie N C Shih; Robin Elliott; Michael D Feldman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-10-24

5.  Separation of benign and malignant glands in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sabrina Rashid; Ladan Fazli; Alexander Boag; Robert Siemens; Purang Abolmaesumi; Septimiu E Salcudean
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

6.  Statistical Shape Model for Manifold Regularization: Gleason grading of prostate histology.

Authors:  Rachel Sparks; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Robert L Camp; Gina G Chung; David L Rimm
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Improved prediction of prostate cancer recurrence through systems pathology.

Authors:  Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Angeliki Kotsianti; David A Verbel; Mikhail Teverovskiy; Paola Capodieci; Stefan Hamann; Yusuf Jeffers; Mark Clayton; Faysal Elkhettabi; Faisal M Khan; Marina Sapir; Valentina Bayer-Zubek; Yevgen Vengrenyuk; Stephen Fogarsi; Olivier Saidi; Victor E Reuter; Howard I Scher; Michael W Kattan; Fernando J Bianco; Thomas M Wheeler; Gustavo E Ayala; Peter T Scardino; Michael J Donovan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Systems pathology approach for the prediction of prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael J Donovan; Stefan Hamann; Mark Clayton; Faisal M Khan; Marina Sapir; Valentina Bayer-Zubek; Gerardo Fernandez; Ricardo Mesa-Tejada; Mikhail Teverovskiy; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  New algorithms based on the Voronoi Diagram applied in a pilot study on normal mucosa and carcinomas.

Authors:  J Sudbø; R Marcelpoil; A Reith
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.916

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Histopathological Image QTL Discovery of Immune Infiltration Variants.

Authors:  Joseph D Barry; Maud Fagny; Joseph N Paulson; Hugo J W L Aerts; John Platig; John Quackenbush
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-07-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.