Literature DB >> 18709429

Determining femoral component position using CAS and measured resection.

James Benjamin1.   

Abstract

To evaluate the ability of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) to accurately size and determine rotational alignment of the femoral component in TKA, the author reviewed femoral component position after 50 consecutive primary TKAs using a femur-first, measured resection workflow. The computer software used allowed femoral rotation to be selected based on epicondylar axis, posterior condylar axis, or anteroposterior axis. The final femoral component size and position was determined by the surgeon to avoid anterior notching, match the posterior-medial condyle resection, and flexed to match the plane of the anterior femoral cortex. Femoral sizing was confirmed intraoperatively with a standard sizing guide. The femoral component was downsized in 52% of patients from the size recommended by the computer software. The posterior condylar axis matched the implanted rotational position of the femoral component to within 1 degrees in 64% of patients in contrast to the epicondylar axis (32%) and anteroposterior axis (26%). CAS provides information to make surgical decisions but does not replace clinical judgment. Landmark referencing may be compromised by limited surgical exposures leading to variation in implant positioning by computer software. A clear understanding of the principles of TKA is critical when using CAS to optimize implant sizing and position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18709429      PMCID: PMC2565061          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0426-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

1.  A comparison of 4 intraoperative methods to determine femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C W Olcott; R D Scott
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Relationship between frontal knee alignment and reference axes in the distal femur.

Authors:  M Akagi; E Yamashita; T Nakagawa; T Asano; T Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial.

Authors:  S K Chauhan; R G Scott; W Breidahl; R J Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

4.  The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D D Rhoads; P C Noble; J D Reuben; O M Mahoney; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

6.  Sagittal plane positioning of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P M Faris; M A Ritter; E M Keating
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Total joint arthroplasty of the knee.

Authors:  D S Hungerford; K A Krackow
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The effect of femoral component position on the kinematics of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D D Rhoads; P C Noble; J D Reuben; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement.

Authors:  P A Lotke; M L Ecker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Patellar prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty. A roentgenographic study.

Authors:  L S Gomes; J E Bechtold; R B Gustilo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  Computer-assisted surgery improves rotational positioning of the femoral component but not the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Alfonso Noriega-Fernandez; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Carreira; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Simon; Jimena Llorens de los Rios
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Highlighting the advantages and benefits of cementless total knee arthroplasty (Review).

Authors:  Bogdan Uivaraseanu; Cosmin Mihai Vesa; Delia Mirela Tit; Octavian Maghiar; Teodor Andrei Maghiar; Calin Hozan; Aurelia Cristina Nechifor; Tapan Behl; Felicia Liana Andronie-Cioara; Jenel Marian Patrascu; Simona Bungau
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Henrica M J van der Linden-van der Zwaag; Janneke Bos; Huub J L van der Heide; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Gap balancing vs. measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian K Daines; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-02-14

5.  Reliability of Imageless Computer-Assisted Navigation for Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Leelasestaporn; M Thuwapitchayanant; P Sirithanapipat; P Sa-Ngasoongsong; P Ruengsilsuwit
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2021-03

6.  Agreement in component size between preoperative measurement, navigation and final implant in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Alfonso Noriega-Fernandez; Sergio Roncero-Gonzalez; Ivan Perez-Coto; Andres A Sierra-Pereira; Manuel A Sandoval-Garcia
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 5.191

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.