Literature DB >> 18708480

Self-sampling for oropharyngeal and rectal specimens to screen for sexually transmitted infections: acceptability among men who have sex with men.

S Wayal1, C Llewellyn, H Smith, M Hankins, A Phillips, D Richardson, M Fisher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the feasibility and acceptability of self-sampling for oropharyngeal and rectal specimens to screen for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM). Participant's willingness to self-sample at home was also explored.
METHODS: Participants of a study to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of self versus nurse taken oropharyngeal and rectal specimens were surveyed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of self-sampling using specimen collection methods (gargle, OraSure mouth pad to collect oropharyngeal specimens and APTIMA unisex swabs to collect rectal and pharyngeal specimens). Acceptability was measured using a five-point Likert-type response scale (for example, 1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). Open-ended questions explored participants' experiences of self-sampling.
RESULTS: Of 334 eligible MSM, 301 (90%) participated in the study. Altogether, 301 participants self-sampled using gargle and rectal and pharyngeal swabs and 288 using mouth pad. Complete questionnaire data from 274 participants showed that feasibility and acceptability of self-sampling using gargle and mouth pad was higher (92%) than pharyngeal swabs (76%). Rectal swabs were acceptable to 82% participants. Despite some discomfort and difficulty in using swabs, 76% were willing to use all four methods for self-sampling in the future. Home sampling was acceptable (84%) as it was perceived to be less intrusive and more convenient than a clinic visit and likely to reduce genitourinary medicine (GUM) waiting time.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-sampling for rectal and oropharyngeal specimens is feasible and acceptable to MSM. Self-sampling can be offered as an alternative to clinic-based testing and has the potential to improve choice, access and uptake of screening for STIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18708480     DOI: 10.1136/sti.2008.032193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  23 in total

1.  Assessing non-response to a mailed health survey including self-collection of biological material.

Authors:  Anneli Uusküla; Mart Kals; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Preferred methods of sexually transmitted infection service delivery among an urban sample of underserved midwestern men.

Authors:  Randolph D Hubach; Brian Dodge; Alissa Davis; Andrew D Smith; Gregory D Zimet; Barbara Van Der Pol
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Optimizing Screening for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Men Using Self-Collected Swabs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nicholas Yared; Keith Horvath; Oluwaseun Fashanu; Ran Zhao; Jason Baker; Shalini Kulasingam
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Health Care Provider Perceptions of a Sexually Transmitted Infection Self-testing Program in an HIV Care Clinic.

Authors:  Susana Tat; Shireesha Dhanireddy; Jeanne M Marrazzo; Lindley A Barbee
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  The "3 in 1" Study: Pooling Self-Taken Pharyngeal, Urethral, and Rectal Samples into a Single Sample for Analysis for Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  B Sultan; J A White; R Fish; G Carrick; N Brima; A Copas; A Robinson; R Gilson; D Mercey; P Benn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Recruiting a U.S. national sample of HIV-negative gay and bisexual men to complete at-home self-administered HIV/STI testing and surveys: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Christian Grov; Demetria Cain; Thomas H F Whitfield; H Jonathon Rendina; Mark Pawson; Ana Ventuneac; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2016-03-01

7.  Characteristics Associated With Urethral and Rectal Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Diagnoses in a US National Sample of Gay and Bisexual Men: Results From the One Thousand Strong Panel.

Authors:  Christian Grov; Demetria Cain; H Jonathan Rendina; Ana Ventuneac; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Changing from Clinician-Collected to Self-Collected Throat Swabs for Oropharyngeal Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Screening among Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Eric P F Chow; Catriona S Bradshaw; Deborah A Williamson; Shauna Hall; Marcus Y Chen; Tiffany R Phillips; Ria Fortune; Kate Maddaford; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Acceptability of home-based chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among a national sample of sexual minority young adults.

Authors:  Annie-Laurie McRee; Allahna Esber; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-03

10.  Implementation and Operational Research: Effectiveness and Patient Acceptability of a Sexually Transmitted Infection Self-Testing Program in an HIV Care Setting.

Authors:  Lindley A Barbee; Susana Tat; Shireesha Dhanireddy; Jeanne M Marrazzo
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.