CONTEXT: STDs are common among older adolescents and young adults; hence, STD screening is a public health priority. Home-based STD testing could be a strategy to improve screening rates, particularly among at-risk populations, including sexual minority (i.e., nonheterosexual) young adults. METHODS: Data were collected from a national sample of 971 sexual minority young adults aged 18-26 through an online survey in the fall of 2013. Logistic regression analyses identified associations between respondents' characteristics and their willingness to use a home-based test for chlamydia and gonorrhea. RESULTS: A greater proportion of men than of women were willing to use a home-based STD test (81% vs. 68%). Willingness was more likely among gay than among bisexual men, among men insured through their parents than among the uninsured and among those who had had two or more sexual partners in the past year than among those who had had fewer (adjusted odds ratios, 2.0-2.2). Among men, students were less likely than the employed to report willingness for home-based testing (0.4). Among women, willingness was more likely among those who reported at least two partners in the past year than among those who reported fewer (1.6). Overall, respondents' most common concerns about home-based STD testing regarded test accuracy, their ability to do the test correctly and their preference to see a doctor for testing. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based STD testing may be a promising strategy for screening sexual minority young adults; understanding correlates of willingness and young adults' concerns may help inform self-testing programs.
CONTEXT: STDs are common among older adolescents and young adults; hence, STD screening is a public health priority. Home-based STD testing could be a strategy to improve screening rates, particularly among at-risk populations, including sexual minority (i.e., nonheterosexual) young adults. METHODS: Data were collected from a national sample of 971 sexual minority young adults aged 18-26 through an online survey in the fall of 2013. Logistic regression analyses identified associations between respondents' characteristics and their willingness to use a home-based test for chlamydia and gonorrhea. RESULTS: A greater proportion of men than of women were willing to use a home-based STD test (81% vs. 68%). Willingness was more likely among gay than among bisexual men, among men insured through their parents than among the uninsured and among those who had had two or more sexual partners in the past year than among those who had had fewer (adjusted odds ratios, 2.0-2.2). Among men, students were less likely than the employed to report willingness for home-based testing (0.4). Among women, willingness was more likely among those who reported at least two partners in the past year than among those who reported fewer (1.6). Overall, respondents' most common concerns about home-based STD testing regarded test accuracy, their ability to do the test correctly and their preference to see a doctor for testing. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based STD testing may be a promising strategy for screening sexual minority young adults; understanding correlates of willingness and young adults' concerns may help inform self-testing programs.
Authors: Brittany M Charlton; Heather L Corliss; Stacey A Missmer; A Lindsay Frazier; Margaret Rosario; Jessica A Kahn; S Bryn Austin Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Harrell W Chesson; Thomas L Gift; Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Guoyu Tao; Ana P Johnson; Charlotte K Kent Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jill S Huppert; Elizabeth A Hesse; Molly A Bernard; Yang Xiao; Bin Huang; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: William C Miller; Carol A Ford; Martina Morris; Mark S Handcock; John L Schmitz; Marcia M Hobbs; Myron S Cohen; Kathleen Mullan Harris; J Richard Udry Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-05-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mark Gilbert; Travis Salway; Devon Haag; Christopher K Fairley; Jason Wong; Troy Grennan; Zhaida Uddin; Christopher S Buchner; Tom Wong; Mel Krajden; Mark Tyndall; Jean Shoveller; Gina Ogilvie Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Cara Exten; Casey N Pinto; Anne M Gaynor; Beth Meyerson; Stacey B Griner; Barbara Van Der Pol Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Pei Zhen Zhao; Ya Jie Wang; Huan Huan Cheng; Ye Zhang; Wei Ming Tang; Fan Yang; Wei Zhang; Ji Yuan Zhou; Cheng Wang Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Catherine R H Aicken; Sebastian S Fuller; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Claudia S Estcourt; Voula Gkatzidou; Pippa Oakeshott; Kate Hone; S Tariq Sadiq; Pam Sonnenberg; Maryam Shahmanesh Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.295