BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates are increasing in the United States while funding for prevention and treatment programs has declined. Sample self-collection for STI testing in men may provide an acceptable, easy, rapid, and potentially cost-effective method for increasing diagnosis and treatment of STIs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of articles assessing self-collection of anal, oral, or genital swab samples among adult men for detection of STIs and/or human papillomavirus-related dysplasia. We searched for English-language articles in which men 18 years or older were recruited to participate. RESULTS: Our literature search resulted in 1053 citations, with 20 meeting inclusion criteria. Self-collection methods were highly sensitive and comparable with clinician collection for detection of multiple STI pathogens. However, self-collected samples were less likely to be of adequate quality for anorectal cytology and less sensitive for detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia than clinician-collected samples. Self-collection was highly acceptable. Overall, studies were small and heterogeneous and used designs providing lower levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Self-collection methods are a viable option for collecting samples for STI testing in adult men based on their high feasibility, acceptability, and validity. Implementation of self-collection procedures in STI testing venues should be performed to expand opportunities for STI detection and treatment.
BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates are increasing in the United States while funding for prevention and treatment programs has declined. Sample self-collection for STI testing in men may provide an acceptable, easy, rapid, and potentially cost-effective method for increasing diagnosis and treatment of STIs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of articles assessing self-collection of anal, oral, or genital swab samples among adult men for detection of STIs and/or human papillomavirus-related dysplasia. We searched for English-language articles in which men 18 years or older were recruited to participate. RESULTS: Our literature search resulted in 1053 citations, with 20 meeting inclusion criteria. Self-collection methods were highly sensitive and comparable with clinician collection for detection of multiple STI pathogens. However, self-collected samples were less likely to be of adequate quality for anorectal cytology and less sensitive for detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia than clinician-collected samples. Self-collection was highly acceptable. Overall, studies were small and heterogeneous and used designs providing lower levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Self-collection methods are a viable option for collecting samples for STI testing in adult men based on their high feasibility, acceptability, and validity. Implementation of self-collection procedures in STI testing venues should be performed to expand opportunities for STI detection and treatment.
Authors: Mark Gilbert; Michael Kwag; Wendy Mei; Claudia Rank; Rhonda Kropp; Alberto Severini; Dirk van Niekerk; Chen Zhou; Natasha Press; Gina Ogilvie; Tom Wong Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Thomas M Lampinen; Keith Chan; Aranka Anema; Janet Kornegay; Robert S Hogg; Francois Coutlee Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Max A Chernesky; Dan Jang; Eder Portillo; Marek Smieja; Jodi Gilchrist; Ruth Ewert; Cindy Macritchie Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: B Dodge; B Van Der Pol; J G Rosenberger; M Reece; A M Roth; D Herbenick; J D Fortenberry Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Nancy F Crum-Cianflone; Katherine Huppler Hullsiek; Vincent C Marconi; Anuradha Ganesan; Amy Weintrob; Robert V Barthel; Brian K Agan Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-02-20 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Charlotte A Gaydos; Mathilda R Barnes; Nicole Quinn; Mary Jett-Goheen; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2013-01-26 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Tolulope Y Odesanmi; Sharada P Wasti; Omolola S Odesanmi; Omololu Adegbola; Olubukola O Oguntuase; Sajid Mahmood Journal: Sex Health Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.706
Authors: Katherine T Li; Weiming Tang; Dan Wu; Wenting Huang; Feng Wu; Amy Lee; Henry Feng; Stephen W Pan; Larry Han; Vincent Mak; Ligang Yang; Joseph D Tucker Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Tiange P Zhang; Fan Yang; Weiming Tang; Marcus Alexander; Laura Forastiere; Navin Kumar; Katherine Li; Fei Zou; Ligang Yang; Guodong Mi; Yehua Wang; Wenting Huang; Amy Lee; Weizan Zhu; Peter Vickerman; Dan Wu; Bin Yang; Nicholas A Christakis; Joseph D Tucker Journal: Infect Dis Poverty Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 4.520
Authors: David J Brennan; Maxime Charest; Aaron Turpin; Dane Griffiths; Barry D Adam; John Maxwell; Keith McCrady; Robbie Ahmed Journal: Sex Res Social Policy Date: 2022-04-28
Authors: Alan G Nyitray; Vanessa Schick; Michael D Swartz; Anna R Giuliano; Maria E Fernandez; Ashish A Deshmukh; Timothy J Ridolfi; Christopher Ajala; Bridgett Brzezinski; Micaela Sandoval; Belinda Nedjai; Jennifer S Smith; Elizabeth Y Chiao Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 2.692