Literature DB >> 18701927

Sterilization in the United States.

Deborah Bartz, James A Greenberg.   

Abstract

Unintended pregnancies are expensive for patients and for society in terms of medical costs, the cost of caring for more children, and the cost to personal and professional goals. Sterilization is the most common contraceptive method utilized by couples in the United States. Given technological advances over the past few decades, male and female surgical sterilization has become a safe, convenient, easy, and highly effective birth control method for the long term. This article reviews current male and female sterilization options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sterilization; Transcervical tubal occlusion; Tubal ligation; Vasectomy

Year:  2008        PMID: 18701927      PMCID: PMC2492586     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1941-2797


  57 in total

1.  Tubal sterilization and the long-term risk of hysterectomy.

Authors:  A Stergachis; K K Shy; L C Grothaus; E H Wagner; J A Hecht; G Anderson; E H Normand; J Raboud
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Hysterectomy, tubal sterilization, and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  K L Irwin; N C Lee; H B Peterson; G L Rubin; P A Wingo; M G Mandel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.

Authors:  Mark D Levie; Scott G Chudnoff
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  H B Peterson; Z Xia; J M Hughes; L S Wilcox; L R Tylor; J Trussell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Long-term risk of hysterectomy among 80,007 sterilized and comparison women at Kaiser Permanente, 1971-1987.

Authors:  M K Goldhaber; M A Armstrong; I M Golditch; P R Sheehe; D B Petitti; G D Friedman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994-1996.

Authors:  A P MacKay; B A Kieke; L M Koonin; K Beattie
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

7.  Concomitant Essure tubal sterilization and Thermachoice endometrial ablation: feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Rafael F Valle; Jesus Valdez; Thomas C Wright; Mary Kenney
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Tubal sterilization and risk of subsequent hospital admission for menstrual disorders.

Authors:  K K Shy; A Stergachis; L G Grothaus; E H Wagner; J Hecht; G Anderson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Tissue response to the STOP microcoil transcervical permanent contraceptive device: results from a prehysterectomy study.

Authors:  R F Valle; C S Carignan; T C Wright
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Risk of testicular cancer after vasectomy: cohort study of over 73,000 men.

Authors:  H Møller; L B Knudsen; E Lynge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-30
View more
  14 in total

1.  Clinical performance characteristics of the adiana® system for permanent contraception: the first year of commercial use.

Authors:  Seth J Herbst; Edward G Evantash
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

2.  Design, Manufacture, and In vivo Testing of a Tissue Scaffold for Permanent Female Sterilization by Tubal Occlusion.

Authors:  Prajan Divakar; Isabella Caruso; Karen L Moodie; Regan N Theiler; P Jack Hoopes; Ulrike G K Wegst
Journal:  MRS Adv       Date:  2018-01-15

3.  Molar pregnancy after tubal ligation in a patient with neuroendocrine tumour: when a rare condition coincides with an unexpected diagnosis.

Authors:  Afi Mansa Semenya; Caroline Roberts; Anne Mounsey
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-30

4.  Psychosocial implications of tubal ligation in a rural health district: a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Prosper M Lutala; Jannie F Hugo; Levi N Luhiriri
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Vasectomy Knowledge and Interest Among U.S. Men Who Do Not Intend to Have More Children.

Authors:  Kari White; Macarena Martínez Órdenes; David K Turok; Jessica D Gipson; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2022 May-Jun

6.  Comparison of tubal sterilization procedures performed by keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery and conventional CO2 laparoscopy: a case controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Kahraman Ülker; Urfettin Hüseyinoğlu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-24

7.  Factors Related to Intention to Undergo Female Sterilization Among Married Women in Rural Kathmandu, Nepal.

Authors:  Adhish Dhungana; Sutham Nanthamongkolchai; Supachai Pitikultang
Journal:  Nepal J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 8.  Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review.

Authors:  Danielle M Panelli; Catherine H Phillips; Paula C Brady
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2015-10-15

9.  Barriers to Offering Vasectomy at Publicly Funded Family Planning Organizations in Texas.

Authors:  Kari White; Anthony Campbell; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2017-02-01

10.  Preprocedure patient preferences and attitudes toward permanent contraceptive options.

Authors:  Hector O Chapa; Gonzalo Venegas
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.