Literature DB >> 8213755

Long-term risk of hysterectomy among 80,007 sterilized and comparison women at Kaiser Permanente, 1971-1987.

M K Goldhaber1, M A Armstrong, I M Golditch, P R Sheehe, D B Petitti, G D Friedman.   

Abstract

To study the long-term risk of hysterectomy after tubal sterilization, the authors analyzed historical hospital discharge data on 39,502 parous women sterilized during 1971-1984 and 40,505 comparison women matched on age, race, parity, and interval since last birth. Sterilized women were significantly more likely than were comparison women to undergo hysterectomy (relative risk (RR) = 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.44), especially for diagnoses of menstrual dysfunction and pelvic pain (RR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.65-2.13). Higher relative risks were not associated with greater tissue-destructive methods of tubal occlusion. Relative risks were highest for women who were young on the reference date (RR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.79-3.36 for women aged 20-24 years), but declined steadily as age increased (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.72-1.28 for women aged 40-49 years). In all age groups, relative risks were significantly above 1.00 after 7 years of follow-up. Reasons for elevated risks may be related to a greater willingness of sterilized women to forgo their uteruses. The emergence of greater risk in all age groups, however, prevents the authors from ruling out a possible latent biologic effect of tubal sterilization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Americas; Biology; California; Cohort Analysis; Comparative Studies; Delivery Of Health Care; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Female Sterilization; Gynecologic Surgery; Health; Health Services; Hysterectomy; Information; Information Processing; Longterm Effects; North America; Northern America; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Records; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Sterilization, Sexual; Studies; Surgery; Time Factors; Treatment; United States; Urogenital Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8213755     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  3 in total

1.  Association of Hysteroscopic vs Laparoscopic Sterilization With Procedural, Gynecological, and Medical Outcomes.

Authors:  Kim Bouillon; Marion Bertrand; Georges Bader; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Mahmoud Zureik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Inpatient surgical treatment patterns for patients with uterine fibroids in the United States, 1998-2002.

Authors:  Edmund R Becker; James Spalding; Janeen DuChane; Ira R Horowitz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  Deborah Bartz; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.