Literature DB >> 11704120

Tissue response to the STOP microcoil transcervical permanent contraceptive device: results from a prehysterectomy study.

R F Valle1, C S Carignan, T C Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study examines the safety, effectiveness, and local tissue response for a new transcervical fallopian tube permanent contraceptive device, the STOP device (Conceptus, Inc., San Carlos, CA).
DESIGN: Nonrandomized prospective evaluation of tubal occlusion and histologic response.
SETTING: Inpatient, university and university-affiliated medical centers in the United States and Mexico. PATIENT(S): Premenopausal and perimenopausal women with benign indications for hysterectomy who were able to defer their hysterectomy for 1 to 13 weeks. INTERVENTION(S): A transcervically placed microcoil (STOP device) was inserted into the fallopian tubes of women who were scheduled for hysterectomy, and the device was worn for 1 to 12 weeks. At hysterectomy, hysterosalpingography was done to determine tubal occlusion; subsequently, the tubes containing the STOP devices were processed, sectioned, and evaluated to determine the histologic response. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ability to place a device and evaluate tubal occlusion and tissue response. RESULT(S): Devices were placed in 33 women, representing 57 tubes; the women wore the devices from 1 day to 30 weeks. Histology on 27 women (47 tubes) showed an acute inflammatory and fibrotic response in the short term that, over time, became a chronic inflammatory response with extensive fibrosis. CONCLUSION(S): The localized tissue response and notable absence of any normal tubal architecture in the segment of the fallopian tube containing the STOP device supports the postulated mechanisms of action of the device. Prehysterectomy study findings suggest the usefulness of the STOP device for pregnancy prevention, this is being evaluated in long-term safety and effectiveness studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11704120     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02858-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

1.  Incidence of opioid-managed pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization versus laparoscopic sterilization, US 2005-2012.

Authors:  Mitchell M Conover; Jennifer O Howell; Jennifer M Wu; Alan C Kinlaw; Nabarun Dasgupta; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Hysteroscopic sterilization: history and current methods.

Authors:  James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

3.  Transcervical sterilization: a comparison of essure(r) permanent birth control system and adiana(r) permanent contraception system.

Authors:  Sophia N Palmer; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Biomaterials and Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Isabella Claure; Deborah Anderson; Catherine M Klapperich; Wendy Kuohung; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Regina Kulier; Juan Manuel Nardin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-05

Review 6.  Fallopian tube catheterization.

Authors:  Amy Suzanne Thurmond
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  Deborah Bartz; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

8.  Increasing Patient Engagement in Pharmacovigilance Through Online Community Outreach and Mobile Reporting Applications: An Analysis of Adverse Event Reporting for the Essure Device in the US.

Authors:  Chi Y Bahk; Melanie Goshgarian; Krystal Donahue; Clark C Freifeld; Christopher M Menone; Carrie E Pierce; Harold Rodriguez; John S Brownstein; Robert Furberg; Nabarun Dasgupta
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2015-08-05

9.  Management of long-term and reversible hysteroscopic sterilization: a novel device with nickel-titanium shape memory alloy.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Ke-an Zhu; Dabao Xu; Aixingzi Aili
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Hysteroscopic sterilization in immunocompromised patients who have intrauterine devices in place: two case reports.

Authors:  Camille Ladanyi; Carlie Field; Kristina Tocce
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.