Literature DB >> 19692411

Cuttlefish camouflage: context-dependent body pattern use during motion.

S Zylinski1, D Osorio, A J Shohet.   

Abstract

It is virtually impossible to camouflage a moving target against a non-uniform background, but strategies have been proposed to reduce detection and targeting of movement. Best known is the idea that high contrast markings produce 'motion dazzle', which impairs judgement of speed and trajectory. The ability of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis to change its visual appearance allows us to compare the animal's choice of patterns during movement to the predictions of models of motion camouflage. We compare cuttlefish body patterns used during movement with those expressed when static on two background types; one of which promotes low-contrast mottle patterns and the other promotes high-contrast disruptive patterns. We find that the body pattern used during motion is context-specific and that high-contrast body pattern components are significantly reduced during movement. Thus, in our experimental conditions, cuttlefish do not use high contrast motion dazzle. It may be that, in addition to being inherently conspicuous during movement, moving high-contrast patterns will attract attention because moving particles in coastal waters tend to be of small size and of low relative contrast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692411      PMCID: PMC2825777          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  23 in total

Review 1.  Camouflage, communication and thermoregulation: lessons from colour changing organisms.

Authors:  Devi Stuart-Fox; Adnan Moussalli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration.

Authors:  R T Hanlon; C-C Chiao; L M Mäthger; A Barbosa; K C Buresch; C Chubb
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Contrasting coloration in terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Tim Caro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Subcortical analysis of visual motion: relative motion, figure-ground discrimination and self-induced optic flow.

Authors:  B J Frost
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1993

7.  Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey.

Authors:  Alan B Bond; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Perception of edges and visual texture in the camouflage of the common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  S Zylinski; D Osorio; A J Shohet
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Edge detection and texture classification by cuttlefish.

Authors:  Sarah Zylinski; Daniel Osorio; Adam J Shohet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Cuttlefish camouflage: visual perception of size, contrast and number of white squares on artificial checkerboard substrata initiates disruptive coloration.

Authors:  C C Chiao; R T Hanlon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  12 in total

1.  Motion dazzle: a locust's eye view.

Authors:  Roger D Santer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Eye-independent, light-activated chromatophore expansion (LACE) and expression of phototransduction genes in the skin of Octopus bimaculoides.

Authors:  M Desmond Ramirez; Todd H Oakley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Adaptive optoelectronic camouflage systems with designs inspired by cephalopod skins.

Authors:  Cunjiang Yu; Yuhang Li; Xun Zhang; Xian Huang; Viktor Malyarchuk; Shuodao Wang; Yan Shi; Li Gao; Yewang Su; Yihui Zhang; Hangxun Xu; Roger T Hanlon; Yonggang Huang; John A Rogers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Motion dazzle and camouflage as distinct anti-predator defenses.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; W Tom L Searle; Jenny E Seymour; Kate L A Marshall; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  In the corner of the eye: camouflaging motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Ioan E Smart; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  An experimental method for evoking and characterizing dynamic color patterning of cuttlefish during prey capture.

Authors:  Danbee Kim; Kendra C Buresch; Roger T Hanlon; Adam R Kampff
Journal:  J Biol Methods       Date:  2022-06-14

7.  Quantification of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) camouflage: a study of color and luminance using in situ spectrometry.

Authors:  Derya Akkaynak; Justine J Allen; Lydia M Mäthger; Chuan-Chin Chiao; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  The evolution of pattern camouflage strategies in waterfowl and game birds.

Authors:  Kate L A Marshall; Thanh-Lan Gluckman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Camouflaging moving objects: crypsis and masquerade.

Authors:  Joanna R Hall; Roland Baddeley; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Adam J Shohet; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Motion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture success.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Jolyon Troscianko; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.