Literature DB >> 7149594

Delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

M J Turunen, P Peltokallio.   

Abstract

The causes of long delay by the doctor (Dd) in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer are discussed. The median delay in this whole prospective material (100 patients) was 9.8 months (Dd 5.4 months and patient's delay (Pd) 4.4 months) compared to 18.1 months (Dd 14.7 months and Pd 3.4 months) in the 30 patients severely delayed (Dd more than 6 months). A false negative barium enema (16 patients) and acceptance of the patient's symptoms without resort to investigation were the main causes of severe delay. The most common error of diagnosis were haemorrhoids and anaemia. Tumours in the right hemicolon were the most difficult one to diagnose representing 53% of those severely delayed. The false negative barium enemas were mainly attributed to small sized early stage cancers of which 69% were located in right hemicolon, indicating also the diagnostic difficulties in this part of the colon. The age distribution among those severely delayed showed slight predominance of patients younger than 50 years, resulting from lack of cancer-conscious attitude of the doctors examining younger patients. Males outnumbered females among those severely delayed. This study emphasizes that a more cancer-conscious doctor with a more critical attitude to barium enema examination and willing to use colorectal endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal diseases provides the key to a shorter delay and thus maybe to improved survival

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7149594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol        ISSN: 0355-9521


  7 in total

1.  Why so late?!--delay in treatment of colorectal cancer is socially determined.

Authors:  Mike Ralf Langenbach; Stefan Sauerland; Karl-Wilhelm Kröbel; Hubert Zirngibl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Lagtimes in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: determinants and association with cancer stage and survival.

Authors:  J Wattacheril; J R Kramer; P Richardson; B D Havemann; L K Green; A Le; H B El-Serag
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 8.171

3.  Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Kuang Daci; Laura A Petersen; Clyde Collins; Nancy J Petersen; Anila Shethia; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Influence of marital status on survival from colon and rectal cancer in Denmark.

Authors:  C Johansen; G Schou; H Soll-Johanning; A Mellemgaard; E Lynge
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal symptoms in diagnostics and adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Leena-Maija Soveri; Pia Osterlund; Tarja Ruotsalainen; Tuija Poussa; Hilpi Rautelin; Petri Bono
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Use of general practice, diagnostic investigations and hospital services before and after cancer diagnosis - a population-based nationwide registry study of 127,000 incident adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Karina Garnier Christensen; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Kaare Rud Flarup; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Mitchell; S Macdonald; N C Campbell; D Weller; U Macleod
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.