Literature DB >> 17101937

The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Hashem B El-Serag1, Laura Petersen, Howard Hampel, Peter Richardson, Gregory Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medicare data indicate an increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using colonoscopy and a decline in fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema. Because of differences in the delivery of health care, this trend in use of colonoscopy in fee-for-service settings might not be paralleled in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
METHODS: National inpatient and outpatient VA databases were searched for codes indicative of colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, fecal occult blood testing, and double-contrast barium enema during fiscal years 1998 to 2003 among VA users aged 49 to 75 years.
RESULTS: The frequency of tests for CRC screening increased from 432,778 in 1998 to 1,179,764 in 2003. Of those who were screened, only the proportion of subjects screened with fecal occult blood testing increased from 81.7% to 90.4%, while screening colonoscopy declined from 5.7% to 4.7%; flexible sigmoidoscopy declined from 8.3% to 3.6%; and double-contrast barium enema declined from 4.1% to 1.3%. The total use of screening colonoscopy procedures increased from 24,955 in 1998 to 55,199 in 2003, but the proportion of colonoscopy procedures performed for CRC screening purposes increased only slightly from 34.3% to 38.4%. In regression models adjusting for age, race, and sex, there was no consistent secular trend in the likelihood of undergoing screening colonoscopy for patients cared for in the VA health care system.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer screening has dramatically increased in the VA, but unlike in other practice settings, fecal occult blood testing is the dominant mode of screening. Although screening colonoscopy more than doubled in frequency, it constitutes a small proportion of the total CRC screening procedures used in the VA health care setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17101937     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  48 in total

1.  Modestly increased use of colonoscopy when copayments are waived.

Authors:  Shabnam Khatami; Lei Xuan; Rolando Roman; Song Zhang; Charles McConnel; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; James E Savarino; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Karen M Kuntz; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Pitfalls of using administrative data for research.

Authors:  David Lieberman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Reducing referral delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis: is it about how you ask?

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Laura A Petersen; Kuang Daci; Clyde Collins; Myrna Khan; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-06-27

5.  Rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening by race among motivated men participating in a Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Karen Ruth; Veda N Giri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Effectiveness of a provider reminder on fecal occult blood test follow-up.

Authors:  Meaghan F Larson; Cynthia W Ko; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among women in rural central Pennsylvania: primary care physicians' perspective.

Authors:  Lara A Rosenwasser; Jennifer S McCall-Hosenfeld; Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Amanda N Perry; Cynthia H Chuang
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Himabindu Kadiyala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Anila Shethia; Hashem El-Serag; Annette Walder; Maria E Velez; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Qualitative study of physician perspectives on classifying screening and nonscreening colonoscopy using administrative health data: adding practice does not make perfect.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Robert Hilsden; Lawrence Joseph; Linda Rabineck; Lawrence Paszat; Alain Bitton; Mary Anne Cooper
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  Underuse and Overuse of Colonoscopy for Repeat Screening and Surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Robert S Sandler; Janet M Grubber; Marcus R Johnson; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.