Literature DB >> 18691260

Genetic diversity revealed in human faces.

Hanne C Lie1, Gillian Rhodes, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

From an evolutionary perspective, human facial attractiveness is proposed to signal mate quality. Using a novel approach to the study of the genetic basis of human preferences for facial features, we investigated whether attractiveness signals mate quality in terms of genetic diversity. Genetic diversity in general has been linked to fitness and reproductive success, and genetic diversity within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) has been linked to immunocompetence and mate preferences. We asked whether any preference for genetic diversity is specific to MHC diversity or reflects a more general preference for overall genetic diversity. We photographed and genotyped 160 participants using microsatellite markers situated within and outside the MHC, and calculated two measures of genetic diversity: mean heterozygosity and standardized mean d(2). Our results suggest a special role for the MHC in female preferences for male faces. MHC heterozygosity positively predicted male attractiveness, and specifically facial averageness, with averageness mediating the MHC-attractiveness relationship. For females, standardized mean d(2) at non-MHC loci predicted facial symmetry. Thus, attractive facial characteristics appear to provide visual cues to genetic quality in both males and females, supporting the view that face preferences have been shaped by selection pressures to identify high-quality mates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18691260     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00478.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  33 in total

Review 1.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Mate preferences and infectious disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans.

Authors:  Joshua M Tybur; Steven W Gangestad
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Women can judge sexual unfaithfulness from unfamiliar men's faces.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Grace Morley; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Human's cognitive ability to assess facial cues from photographs: a study of sexual selection in the Bolivian Amazon.

Authors:  Eduardo A Undurraga; Dan T A Eisenberg; Oyunbileg Magvanjav; Ruoxue Wang; William R Leonard; Thomas W McDade; Victoria Reyes-García; Colleen Nyberg; Susan Tanner; Tomás Huanca; Ricardo A Godoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans.

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Nicholas Pound; Ian D Stephen; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Facial attractiveness is related to women's cortisol and body fat, but not with immune responsiveness.

Authors:  Markus J Rantala; Vinet Coetzee; Fhionna R Moore; Ilona Skrinda; Sanita Kecko; Tatjana Krama; Inese Kivleniece; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Adiposity, compared with masculinity, serves as a more valid cue to immunocompetence in human mate choice.

Authors:  Markus J Rantala; Vinet Coetzee; Fhionna R Moore; Ilona Skrinda; Sanita Kecko; Tatjana Krama; Inese Kivleniece; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Does genetic diversity predict health in humans?

Authors:  Hanne C Lie; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Andrew P Clark; Lynda G Boothroyd; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Geographic variation in chin shape challenges the universal facial attractiveness hypothesis.

Authors:  Zaneta M Thayer; Seth D Dobson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.