Literature DB >> 23221873

Women can judge sexual unfaithfulness from unfamiliar men's faces.

Gillian Rhodes1, Grace Morley, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

We routinely form impressions of people from their faces, and these impressions sometimes contain a kernel of truth. Impressions of trustworthiness are central to interpersonal relationships, but their accuracy remains contentious. Here, we investigated whether sexual trustworthiness (faithfulness) can be accurately judged from opposite-sex strangers' faces. Women's ratings of men's unfaithfulness showed small-moderate correlations with men's past unfaithfulness (cheating, poaching). Women used masculinity as a valid cue to unfaithfulness. Men's unfaithfulness ratings showed small, non-significant correlations with unfaithfulness, although formal tests for sex differences yielded equivocal results. Women were less likely than men to erroneously classify unfaithful individuals as faithful. We conclude that impressions of sexual faithfulness from faces have a kernel of truth, at least for women, and that they may help people assess the quality of potential mates about whom they have minimal behavioural information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23221873      PMCID: PMC3565506          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

1.  Differential accuracy in person perception across traits: examination of a functional hypothesis.

Authors:  S W Gangestad; J A Simpson; K DiGeronimo; M Biek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1992-04

Review 2.  The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 3.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The analysis of fluctuating asymmetry redux: the robustness of parametric statistics

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  More Voodoo correlations: when average-based measures inflate correlations.

Authors:  Andrew Brand; Michael T Bradley
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

6.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

7.  Sex Differences in Detecting Sexual Infidelity : Results of a Maximum Likelihood Method for Analyzing the Sensitivity of Sex Differences to Underreporting.

Authors:  Paul W Andrews; Steven W Gangestad; Geoffrey F Miller; Martie G Haselton; Randy Thornhill; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2008-09-04

8.  Mate choice trade-offs and women's preference for physically attractive men.

Authors:  D Waynforth
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2001-09

9.  First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face.

Authors:  Janine Willis; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-07

10.  Genetic diversity revealed in human faces.

Authors:  Hanne C Lie; Gillian Rhodes; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  6 in total

1.  Putative sex-specific human pheromones do not affect gender perception, attractiveness ratings or unfaithfulness judgements of opposite sex faces.

Authors:  Robin M Hare; Sophie Schlatter; Gillian Rhodes; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.963

2.  Using Computer Simulations for Investigating a Sex Education Intervention: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Anastasia Eleftheriou; Seth Bullock; Cynthia A Graham; Roger Ingham
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.143

3.  Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness?

Authors:  Toneya L McIntosh; Anthony J Lee; Morgan J Sidari; Rebecca E Stower; James M Sherlock; Barnaby J W Dixson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sexual unfaithfulness can be judged with some accuracy from men's but not women's faces.

Authors:  Yong Zhi Foo; Antonina Loncarevic; Leigh W Simmons; Clare A M Sutherland; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Men's Sexual Faithfulness Judgments May Contain a Kernel of Truth.

Authors:  Samantha Leivers; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impressions of sexual unfaithfulness and their accuracy show a degree of universality.

Authors:  Clare A M Sutherland; Laura M Martin; Nadine Kloth; Leigh W Simmons; Yong Zhi Foo; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.