Literature DB >> 18683466

Bayesian approaches to associative learning: from passive to active learning.

John K Kruschke1.   

Abstract

Traditional associationist models represent an organism's knowledge state by a single strength of association on each associative link. Bayesian models instead represent knowledge by a distribution of graded degrees of belief over a range of candidate hypotheses. Many traditional associationist models assume that the learner is passive, adjusting strengths of association only in reaction to stimuli delivered by the environment. Bayesian models, on the other hand, can describe how the learner should actively probe the environment to learn optimally. The first part of this article reviews two Bayesian accounts of backward blocking, a phenomenon that is challenging for many traditional theories. The broad Bayesian framework, in which these models reside, is also selectively reviewed. The second part focuses on two formalizations of optimal active learning: maximizing either the expected information gain or the probability gain. New analyses of optimal active learning by a Kalman filter and by a noisy-logic gate show that these two Bayesian models make different predictions for some environments. The Kalman filter predictions are disconfirmed in at least one case.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18683466     DOI: 10.3758/lb.36.3.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  13 in total

Review 1.  Learning and selective attention.

Authors:  P Dayan; S Kakade; P R Montague
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Context-sensitive elemental theory.

Authors:  Allan R Wagner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-02

3.  A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning.

Authors:  Noah D Goodman; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Jacob Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-01-02

4.  Acquisition and extinction in autoshaping.

Authors:  Sham Kakade; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Locally Bayesian learning with applications to retrospective revaluation and highlighting.

Authors:  John K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Bayesian spiking neurons II: learning.

Authors:  Sophie Deneve
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Second-order conditioning and Pavlovian conditioned inhibition: operational similarities and differences.

Authors:  H Yin; R C Barnet; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-10

8.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Finding useful questions: on Bayesian diagnosticity, probability, impact, and information gain.

Authors:  Jonathan D Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  People want to see information that will help them make valid inferences in human causal learning.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandorpe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07
View more
  32 in total

1.  Bayesian data analysis for newcomers.

Authors:  John K Kruschke; Torrin M Liddell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

2.  Neural Computations Underlying Causal Structure Learning.

Authors:  Momchil S Tomov; Hayley M Dorfman; Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cognitive control over learning: creating, clustering, and generalizing task-set structure.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Sure enough: efficient Bayesian learning and choice.

Authors:  Brad R Foley; Paul Marjoram
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Context-dependent learning and causal structure.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

6.  Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Stephan Waldert; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Training attention improves decision making in individuals with elevated self-reported depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Jessica A Cooper; Marissa A Gorlick; Taylor Denny; Darrell A Worthy; Christopher G Beevers; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 10.  From drugs to deprivation: a Bayesian framework for understanding models of psychosis.

Authors:  P R Corlett; C D Frith; P C Fletcher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.