Literature DB >> 23356780

Cognitive control over learning: creating, clustering, and generalizing task-set structure.

Anne G E Collins1, Michael J Frank.   

Abstract

Learning and executive functions such as task-switching share common neural substrates, notably prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Understanding how they interact requires studying how cognitive control facilitates learning but also how learning provides the (potentially hidden) structure, such as abstract rules or task-sets, needed for cognitive control. We investigate this question from 3 complementary angles. First, we develop a new context-task-set (C-TS) model, inspired by nonparametric Bayesian methods, specifying how the learner might infer hidden structure (hierarchical rules) and decide to reuse or create new structure in novel situations. Second, we develop a neurobiologically explicit network model to assess mechanisms of such structured learning in hierarchical frontal cortex and basal ganglia circuits. We systematically explore the link between these modeling levels across task demands. We find that the network provides an approximate implementation of high-level C-TS computations, with specific neural mechanisms modulating distinct C-TS parameters. Third, this synergism yields predictions about the nature of human optimal and suboptimal choices and response times during learning and task-switching. In particular, the models suggest that participants spontaneously build task-set structure into a learning problem when not cued to do so, which predicts positive and negative transfer in subsequent generalization tests. We provide experimental evidence for these predictions and show that C-TS provides a good quantitative fit to human sequences of choices. These findings implicate a strong tendency to interactively engage cognitive control and learning, resulting in structured abstract representations that afford generalization opportunities and, thus, potentially long-term rather than short-term optimality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23356780      PMCID: PMC3974273          DOI: 10.1037/a0030852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  85 in total

1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging examination of two modular architectures for switching multiple internal models.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamizu; Tomoe Kuroda; Toshinori Yoshioka; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The primate basal ganglia: parallel and integrative networks.

Authors:  Suzanne N Haber
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.052

3.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Thomas V Wiecki; Michael X Cohen; Christina M Figueroa; Johan Samanta; Scott J Sherman; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition.

Authors:  Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The emergent neural modeling system.

Authors:  Brad Aisa; Brian Mingus; Randy O'Reilly
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2008-07-01

6.  Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex and individual differences in uncertainty-driven exploration.

Authors:  David Badre; Bradley B Doll; Nicole M Long; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Structure learning in human sequential decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel E Acuña; Paul Schrater
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Somatotopic organization of the primate Basal Ganglia.

Authors:  Atsushi Nambu
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.856

10.  Impulsive personality predicts dopamine-dependent changes in frontostriatal activity during component processes of working memory.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Margaret Sheridan; Emily Jacobs; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  114 in total

1.  Multiple gates on working memory.

Authors:  Christopher H Chatham; David Badre
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2015-02-01

2.  8-month-old infants spontaneously learn and generalize hierarchical rules.

Authors:  Denise M Werchan; Anne G E Collins; Michael J Frank; Dima Amso
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-15

3.  Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Henry M Jones; Johanny Castillo; David Badre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Rule encoding in dorsal striatum impacts action selection.

Authors:  Gregory B Bissonette; Matthew R Roesch
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  A tweaking principle for executive control: neuronal circuit mechanism for rule-based task switching and conflict resolution.

Authors:  Salva Ardid; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Learning task-state representations.

Authors:  Yael Niv
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Chunking as a rational strategy for lossy data compression in visual working memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Julie C Helmers; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  How cognitive theory guides neuroscience.

Authors:  Michael J Frank; David Badre
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

9.  Corticostriatal output gating during selection from working memory.

Authors:  Christopher H Chatham; Michael J Frank; David Badre
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Schematic memory components converge within angular gyrus during retrieval.

Authors:  Isabella C Wagner; Mariët van Buuren; Marijn C W Kroes; Tjerk P Gutteling; Marieke van der Linden; Richard G Morris; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.