Literature DB >> 28669114

Sure enough: efficient Bayesian learning and choice.

Brad R Foley1, Paul Marjoram2.   

Abstract

Probabilistic decision-making is a general phenomenon in animal behavior, and has often been interpreted to reflect the relative certainty of animals' beliefs. Extensive neurological and behavioral results increasingly suggest that animal beliefs may be represented as probability distributions, with explicit accounting of uncertainty. Accordingly, we develop a model that describes decision-making in a manner consistent with this understanding of neuronal function in learning and conditioning. This first-order Markov, recursive Bayesian algorithm is as parsimonious as its minimalist point-estimate, Rescorla-Wagner analogue. We show that the Bayesian algorithm can reproduce naturalistic patterns of probabilistic foraging, in simulations of an experiment in bumblebees. We go on to show that the Bayesian algorithm can efficiently describe the behavior of several heuristic models of decision-making, and is consistent with the ubiquitous variation in choice that we observe within and between individuals in implementing heuristic decision-making. By describing learning and decision-making in a single Bayesian framework, we believe we can realistically unify descriptions of behavior across contexts and organisms. A unified cognitive model of this kind may facilitate descriptions of behavioral evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; Decision-making; Foraging; Learning; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28669114      PMCID: PMC5709194          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-017-1107-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  52 in total

1.  Is that what Bayesians believe? reply to Griffiths, Chater, Norris, and Pouget (2012).

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bowers; Colin J Davis
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Heuristic decision making.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  A neural circuit model of flexible sensorimotor mapping: learning and forgetting on multiple timescales.

Authors:  Stefano Fusi; Wael F Asaad; Earl K Miller; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Neural coding of uncertainty and probability.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Mehrdad Jazayeri
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Memory and the efficient use of information.

Authors:  J M McNamara; A I Houston
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1987-04-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 6.  Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns.

Authors:  Alexandre Pouget; Jeffrey M Beck; Wei Ji Ma; Peter E Latham
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference.

Authors:  A Bröder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Comparing alternative models to empirical data: cognitive models of western scrub-jay foraging behavior.

Authors:  Barney Luttbeg; Tom A Langen
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  The three principles of action: a Pavlovian-instrumental transfer hypothesis.

Authors:  Emilio Cartoni; Stefano Puglisi-Allegra; Gianluca Baldassarre
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Does Amount of Information Support Aesthetic Values?

Authors:  Norberto M Grzywacz; Hassan Aleem
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Two-dimensional reward evaluation in mice.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; Marion Rivalan; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.084

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.