Literature DB >> 18681612

Consonant identification in noise by native and non-native listeners: effects of local context.

Anne Cutler1, Maria Luisa Garcia Lecumberri, Martin Cooke.   

Abstract

Speech recognition in noise is harder in second (L2) than first languages (L1). This could be because noise disrupts speech processing more in L2 than L1, or because L1 listeners recover better though disruption is equivalent. Two similar prior studies produced discrepant results: Equivalent noise effects for L1 and L2 (Dutch) listeners, versus larger effects for L2 (Spanish) than L1. To explain this, the latter experiment was presented to listeners from the former population. Larger noise effects on consonant identification emerged for L2 (Dutch) than L1 listeners, suggesting that task factors rather than L2 population differences underlie the results discrepancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18681612     DOI: 10.1121/1.2946707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bVd/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers.

Authors:  Catherine L Rogers; Teresa M DeMasi; Jean C Krause
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Perception of Place of Articulation for Plosives and Fricatives in Noise.

Authors:  Abeer Alwan; Jintao Jiang; Willa Chen
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.017

4.  Clinical assessment of spectral modulation detection for adult cochlear implant recipients: a non-language based measure of performance outcomes.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Andrea Hedley-Williams; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  The Effect of Intensified Language Exposure on Accommodating Talker Variability.

Authors:  Mark Antoniou; Patrick C M Wong; Suiping Wang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Amanda Caldwell; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Similarity and familiarity: Second language sentence recognition in first- and second-language multi-talker babble.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  Children's recognition of American English consonants in noise.

Authors:  Kanae Nishi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Sangsook Choi; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Interdependent processing and encoding of speech and concurrent background noise.

Authors:  Angela Cooper; Susanne Brouwer; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Linguistic Masking Release in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.