Literature DB >> 10625790

Prospective randomized trial comparing Tannenbaum Teflon and standard polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary stenosis.

V Terruzzi1, U Comin, F De Grazia, G L Toti, A Zambelli, S Beretta, G Minoli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the clinical efficacy of the Tannenbaum (TB) biliary prostheses, a recently designed Teflon stent without side holes, with the Cotton-Huibregtse (CH) polyethylene stent.
METHODS: Fifty-seven patients (26 men, mean age 75.5 years) with unresectable malignant tumors and distal biliary stenosis were included (38 pancreatic head cancer, 17 cholangiocarcinoma, 2 ampullary cancer). Patients were prospectively randomized to have a 10F, 7 cm long TB (29 patients) or CH (28 patients) stent inserted endoscopically. Four patients (2 TB and 2 CH) were excluded: 3 because of the failure of stent insertion and 1 because of a protocol violation. The patients were evaluated clinically and, if necessary, with biochemical tests every month until death or until they needed surgery for symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction. When occlusion or dislocation occurred, the stent was replaced with one of the same type. Cumulative stent patency and patient survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis and compared by log-rank chi-square test.
RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in mean age, gender, and diagnosis. The patients were followed for a mean of 145.5 days (range 24 to 613); by the end of the study 47 patients (81%) had died or developed symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction. Median survival was 88 days (range 24 to 613) in the TB group and 75.6 days (23 to 486) in the CH group. Stent exchange (occlusion 16, dislocation 3) was necessary for 5 patients in the TB group and 7 in the CH group. No statistical difference was found on comparing the mean duration of function of the first, second, and third stents (analysis of variance, p = 0.80). The median duration of stent function was 96 days (range 11 to 613) in the TB group and 75.5 days (range 23 to 323) in the CH group. No significant difference was found in either survival time (p = 0.48) or stent patency (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSION: This study found no significant advantage of the Tannenbaum prostheses over the standard polyethylene stent in the palliation for patients with distal malignant biliary stenosis with regard to survival or length of stent patency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10625790     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70381-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  20 in total

Review 1.  Plastic biliary stent occlusion: factors involved and possible preventive approaches.

Authors:  Gianfranco Donelli; Emilio Guaglianone; Roberta Di Rosa; Fausto Fiocca; Antonio Basoli
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2007-03

Review 2.  Antireflux biliary stents: are they the solution to stent occlusions?

Authors:  D Nageshwar Reddy; Rupa Banerjee; Ong Wai Choung
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-04

3.  Biliary stenting in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: comparison of double layer, plastic and metal stents.

Authors:  Saleh Elwir; Kaveh Sharzehi; Joshua Veith; Mathew T Moyer; Charles Dye; Thomas McGarrity; Abraham Mathew
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Tannenbaum and metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal bile duct obstruction: a comparative study of patency and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  P Katsinelos; D Paikos; J Kountouras; G Chatzimavroudis; G Paroutoglou; I Moschos; A Gatopoulou; A Beltsis; C Zavos; B Papaziogas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A comparative evaluation of early stent occlusion among biliary conventional versus wing stents.

Authors:  Mouen A Khashab; Susan Hutfless; Katherine Kim; Anne Marie Lennon; Marcia I Canto; Sanjay B Jagannath; Patrick I Okolo; Eun Ji Shin; Vikesh K Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Time Sequence Evaluation of Biliary Stent Occlusion by Dissection Analysis of Retrieved Stents.

Authors:  Chang-Il Kwon; Mark A Gromski; Stuart Sherman; Jeffrey J Easler; Ihab I El Hajj; James Watkins; Evan L Fogel; Lee McHenry; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The Stent Patency and Migration Rate of Different Shaped Plastic Stents in Bile Flow Phantom Model and In Vivo Animal Bile Duct Dilation Model.

Authors:  Chang-Il Kwon; Gwangil Kim; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Kyoung Ah Kim; Kwang Hyun Ko; Joo Young Cho; Sung Pyo Hong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Endoscopic biliary drainage for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer with obstructive jaundice who are to undergo gemcitabine chemotherapy.

Authors:  Osamu Takasawa; Naotaka Fujita; Go Kobayashi; Yutaka Noda; Kei Ito; Jun Horaguchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Permanent stenting in "unextractable" common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents.

Authors:  Franco Pisello; Girolamo Geraci; Francesco Li Volsi; Giuseppe Modica; Carmelo Sciumè
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Stenting and interventional radiology for obstructive jaundice in patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas.

Authors:  Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Tadahiro Takada; Masaru Miyazaki; Shuichi Miyakawa; Kazuhiro Tsukada; Masato Nagino; Satoshi Kondo; Junji Furuse; Hiroya Saito; Masafumi Suyama; Fumio Kimura; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Satoshi Nozawa; Masahiro Yoshida; Keita Wada; Hodaka Amano; Fumihiko Miura
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.