Literature DB >> 17945223

Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones.

Hong Joo Kim1, Hyo Sun Choi, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Yong Kyun Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Woo Kyu Jeon, Byung Ik Kim, Seon Hyeong Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been no report concerning the factors that contribute to the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of common bile duct (CBD) stones.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the factors that contribute to the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of CBD stones.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: A tertiary referral endoscopy center. PATIENTS: A total of 102 patients who underwent ERCP, endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, and CBD stone extraction at our institution from August 2004 to September 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The technical difficulty of CBD stone clearance was graded as follows: easy, moderately difficult, very difficult, and failed. Distal CBD angulation seen on cholangiogram was defined as the first angulation from the ampullary orifice with the patients in the prone position and the distal arm of CBD angulation as the length (in millimeters) between angular point and ampullary orifice.
RESULTS: Older age (>65 years), previous gastrojejunostomy, larger CBD stone (>/=15 mm), impacted CBD stone, use of mechanical lithotripsy, shorter length of the distal CBD arm (</=36 mm), and more acute distal CBD angulation (</=135 degrees) were all significant contributing factors to the technical difficulty of CBD stone clearance in exploratory univariate statistical tests. In the definitive multivariate analysis, more acute distal CBD angulation and a shorter length of the distal CBD arm were found to be significant, independent contributors to technical difficulty.
CONCLUSIONS: Complete clearance of CBD stones was technically more difficult for the patients with more acute distal CBD angulation and a shorter length of the distal CBD arm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17945223     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  31 in total

1.  Reoperation of biliary tract by laparoscopy: experiences with 39 cases.

Authors:  Li-Bo Li; Xiu-Jun Cai; Yi-Ping Mou; Qi Wei
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Endoscopic removal of large common bile duct stones: time to arm the laser?

Authors:  Stephen J Heller
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Guru Trikudanathan; Udayakumar Navaneethan; Mansour A Parsi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Treatment of Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Abdul Haseeb; Martin L Freeman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

Review 5.  Usefulness of the single-operator cholangioscopy system SpyGlass in biliary disease: a single-center prospective cohort study and aggregated review.

Authors:  Wim Laleman; Kristof Verraes; Werner Van Steenbergen; David Cassiman; Frederik Nevens; Schalk Van der Merwe; Chris Verslype
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Endoscopic Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Murad Aburajab; Kulwinder Dua
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23

7.  Using cholecystokinin to facilitate endoscopic clearance of large common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Tao Tao; Qi-Jie Zhang; Ming Zhang; Xiao Zhu; Shu-Xia Sun; Yan-Qing Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Oldest biliary endoprosthesis in situ.

Authors:  Pierluigi Consolo; Giuseppe Scalisi; Stefano F Crinò; Andrea Tortora; Giuseppa Giacobbe; Marcello Cintolo; Luigi Familiari; Socrate Pallio
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-07-16

9.  Permanent stenting in "unextractable" common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents.

Authors:  Franco Pisello; Girolamo Geraci; Francesco Li Volsi; Giuseppe Modica; Carmelo Sciumè
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Intraprocedural quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anthony T DeBenedet; B Joseph Elmunzer; Sean T McCarthy; Grace H Elta; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.