Literature DB >> 21222199

Preservation of genomic integrity in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Peter J Stambrook1, Elisia D Tichy.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem (ES) cells and germ cells have the potential to give rise to an entire organism. A common requirement is that both must have very robust mechanisms to preserve the integrity of their genomes. This is particularly true since somatic cells have very high mutation frequencies approaching 10-4 in vivo that would lead to unacceptable levels of fetal lethality and congenital defects. Notably, between 70% and 80% of mutational events monitored at a heterozygous endogenous selectable marker were loss of heterozygosity due to mitotic recombination, a mechanism that affects multiple heterozygous loci between the reporter gene and the site of crossing over. This chapter examines three mechanisms by which mouse embryonic stem cells preserve their genomic integrity. The first entails suppression of mutation and recombination between chromosome homologues by two orders of magnitude when compared with isogenic mouse embryo fibroblasts which had a mutation frequency similar to that seen in adult somatic cells. The second renders mouse ES cells hypersensitive to environmental challenge and eliminates damaged cells from the self-renewing population. Mouse ES cells lack a G1 checkpoint so that cells damaged by exogenous insult such as ionizing radiation do not arrest at the G1/S phase checkpoint but progress into the S phase where the damaged DNA is replicated, the damage exacerbated and the cells driven to apoptosis. The third mechanism examines how mouse ES cells repair double strand DNA breaks. Somatic cells predominantly utilize error prone nonhomologous end joining which, from a teleological perspective, would be disadvantageous for ES cells since it would promote accumulation of mutations. When ES cells were tested for the preferred pathway of double strand DNA break repair, they predominantly utilized the high fidelity homology-mediated repair pathway, thereby minimizing the incurrence of mutations during the repair process. When mouse ES cells are induced to differentiate, the predominant repair pathway switches from homology-mediated repair to nonhomologous end joining that is characteristic of somatic cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21222199      PMCID: PMC7339036          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7037-4_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  56 in total

1.  Stress defense in murine embryonic stem cells is superior to that of various differentiated murine cells.

Authors:  Gabriele Saretzki; Lyle Armstrong; Alan Leake; Majlinda Lako; Thomas von Zglinicki
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 2.  Maintaining genetic integrity in aging: a zero sum game.

Authors:  Yousin Suh; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  ON THE NATURE OF THE AGING PROCESS.

Authors:  L Szilard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Targeted disruption of the murine int-1 proto-oncogene resulting in severe abnormalities in midbrain and cerebellar development.

Authors:  K R Thomas; M R Capecchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-08-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Resistance of differentiating spermatogonia to radiation-induced apoptosis and loss in p53-deficient mice.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; Y Zhang; H Niibe; N H Terry; M L Meistrich
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells.

Authors:  Junying Yu; Maxim A Vodyanik; Kim Smuga-Otto; Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget; Jennifer L Frane; Shulan Tian; Jeff Nie; Gudrun A Jonsdottir; Victor Ruotti; Ron Stewart; Igor I Slukvin; James A Thomson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Mouse embryonic stem cells are hypersensitive to apoptosis triggered by the DNA damage O(6)-methylguanine due to high E2F1 regulated mismatch repair.

Authors:  W P Roos; M Christmann; S T Fraser; B Kaina
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 15.828

8.  Determination of spontaneous loss of heterozygosity mutations in Aprt heterozygous mice.

Authors:  P P Van Sloun; S W Wijnhoven; H J Kool; R Slater; G Weeda; A A van Zeeland; P H Lohman; H Vrieling
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Somatic mutations and ageing in silico.

Authors:  Thomas B L Kirkwood; Carole J Proctor
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.432

10.  Expression and loss of alleles in cultured mouse embryonic fibroblasts and stem cells carrying allelic fluorescent protein genes.

Authors:  Jon S Larson; Moying Yin; Jared M Fischer; Saundra L Stringer; James R Stringer
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 2.946

View more
  19 in total

1.  5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxyamide ribonucleoside induces G(1)/S arrest and Nanog downregulation via p53 and enhances erythroid differentiation.

Authors:  Hee-Don Chae; Man-Ryul Lee; Hal E Broxmeyer
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  Heat shock induces apoptosis in human embryonic stem cells but a premature senescence phenotype in their differentiated progeny.

Authors:  Larisa L Alekseenko; Victoria I Zemelko; Valery V Zenin; Nataly A Pugovkina; Irina V Kozhukharova; Zoya V Kovaleva; Tatiana M Grinchuk; Irina I Fridlyanskaya; Nikolay N Nikolsky
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Can an iPS cell secure its genomic fidelity?

Authors:  R Sarig; V Rotter
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 15.828

4.  The DNA Damage Checkpoint Eliminates Mouse Oocytes with Chromosome Synapsis Failure.

Authors:  Vera D Rinaldi; Ewelina Bolcun-Filas; Hiroshi Kogo; Hiroki Kurahashi; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  DNA damage response in neonatal and adult stromal cells compared with induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Stefanie Liedtke; Sophie Biebernick; Teja Falk Radke; Daniela Stapelkamp; Carolin Coenen; Holm Zaehres; Gerhard Fritz; Gesine Kogler
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 6.  Mechanisms maintaining genomic integrity in embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Elisia D Tichy
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2011-07-18

Review 7.  Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors and Stem Cells: Friends or Foes?

Authors:  Nolan Brown; Liujiang Song; Nageswara R Kollu; Matthew L Hirsch
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.695

8.  G1 checkpoint is compromised in mouse ESCs due to functional uncoupling of p53-p21Waf1 signaling.

Authors:  Irina I Suvorova; Bogdan B Grigorash; Ilya A Chuykin; Tatiana V Pospelova; Valery A Pospelov
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Human embryonic stem cells have constitutively active Bax at the Golgi and are primed to undergo rapid apoptosis.

Authors:  Raluca Dumitru; Vivian Gama; B Matthew Fagan; Jacquelyn J Bower; Vijay Swahari; Larysa H Pevny; Mohanish Deshmukh
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  I-SceI-mediated double-strand break does not increase the frequency of homologous recombination at the Dct locus in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Myriam Fenina; Dominique Simon-Chazottes; Sandrine Vandormael-Pournin; Jihane Soueid; Francina Langa; Michel Cohen-Tannoudji; Bruno A Bernard; Jean-Jacques Panthier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.