Literature DB >> 23853406

Focused tight dressing does not prevent cochlear implant magnet migration under 1.5 Tesla MRI.

D Cuda1, A Murri, G Succo.   

Abstract

We report a retrospective case of inner magnet migration, which occurred after 1.5 Tesla MRI scanning in an adult recipient of a bilateral cochlear implant (CI) despite a focused head dressing. The patient, bilaterally implanted with Nucleus 5 CIs (Cochlear LTD, Sydney, Australia), underwent a 1.5 Tesla cholangio-MRI scan for biliary duct pathology. In subsequent days, a focal skin alteration appeared over the left inner coil. Plain skull radiographs showed partial magnet migration on the left side. Surgical exploration confirmed magnet twisting; the magnet was effectively repositioned. Left CI performance was restored to pre-migration level. The wound healed without complications. Thus, focused dressing does not prevent magnet migration in CI recipients undergoing 1.5 Tesla MRI. All patients should be counselled on this potential complication. A minor surgical procedure is required to reposition the magnet. Nevertheless, timely diagnosis is necessary to prevent skin breakdown and subsequent device contamination. Plain skull radiograph is very effective in identifying magnet twisting; it should be performed systematically after MRI or minimally on all suspected cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Complication; Head dressing; Inner coil; MRI; Magnet migration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23853406      PMCID: PMC3665386     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


  11 in total

1.  Case report: Cochlear implant magnet migration.

Authors:  Eric P Wilkinson; Salim Dogru; Ted A Meyer; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Safety study of the Cochlear Nucleus 24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner.

Authors:  Samuel P Gubbels; Sean O McMenomey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Magnet displacement: a rare complication following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Corina Wild; John Allum; Rudolf Probst; Daniel Abels; Claude Fischer; Daniel Bodmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Noninvasive management of cochlear implant's inner magnet displacement after magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Sara Giannantonio; Lorenzo Schinaia; Eugenio De Corso; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Magnet displacement following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Lela Migirov; Jona Kronenberg
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Cochlear implant magnet displacement during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sophie Deneuve; Nathalie Loundon; Nicolas Leboulanger; Isabelle Rouillon; Erea Noel Garabedian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children.

Authors:  N L Cohen; R A Hoffman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Predictors of postoperative performance with cochlear implants.

Authors:  S B Waltzman; S G Fisher; J K Niparko; N L Cohen
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-04

Review 9.  Systematic review of the scientific literature on the economic evaluation of cochlear implants in adult patients.

Authors:  G Turchetti; S Bellelli; I Palla; S Berrettini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 10.  Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients.

Authors:  S Berrettini; A Baggiani; L Bruschini; E Cassandro; D Cuda; R Filipo; I Palla; N Quaranta; F Forli
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.124

View more
  4 in total

1.  Initial Results of a Safety and Feasibility Study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Congenitally Deaf Children.

Authors:  Eric P Wilkinson; Laurie S Eisenberg; Mark D Krieger; Marc S Schwartz; Margaret Winter; Jamie L Glater; Amy S Martinez; Laurel M Fisher; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Magnet and receiver-stimulator displacement after cochlear implantation: Clinical characters and management approaches.

Authors:  Asma Alahmadi; Saad Alenzi; Mohammed Alsheikh; Saeed Alghamdi; Mostafa E Morra; Khalid M Badr
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.422

Review 3.  Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Nina Standaert; Ronald Peeters; Christ Glorieux; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-01-06

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the bone conduction implant - a pilot study at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Bo Håkansson; Sabine Reinfeldt; Cristina Rigato; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-10-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.