PURPOSE: To compare the performance of the conventional diaphragm navigator (DNAV) and the recently developed cardiac fat navigator (FatNAV) in suppressing respiration-induced cardiac motion in free-breathing 3D balanced steady-state free precession coronary MRA (SSFP CMRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 16 healthy volunteers the right coronary artery (RCA) was imaged at 1.5T using a navigator-gated 3D SSFP CMRA sequence. DNAV and FatNAV gating were performed in random order. Image quality difference was scored by three experienced readers blinded to the gating technique. Blood signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), blood-to-myocardium contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and navigator efficiency were calculated. RESULTS: Diagnostically interpretable CMRA was obtained successfully in all 16 subjects with FatNAV gating (0% failure rate) and only 14 subjects with DNAV gating (12% failure rate). Compared to DNAV gating, FatNAV gating provided similar SNR and CNR, better image quality (P < 0.01), and 28% improvement in navigator efficiency (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: FatNAV gating provides more effective motion suppression and better image quality than DNAV gating for free-breathing 3D SSFP CMRA of the RCA in healthy subjects. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To compare the performance of the conventional diaphragm navigator (DNAV) and the recently developed cardiac fat navigator (FatNAV) in suppressing respiration-induced cardiac motion in free-breathing 3D balanced steady-state free precession coronary MRA (SSFP CMRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 16 healthy volunteers the right coronary artery (RCA) was imaged at 1.5T using a navigator-gated 3D SSFP CMRA sequence. DNAV and FatNAV gating were performed in random order. Image quality difference was scored by three experienced readers blinded to the gating technique. Blood signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), blood-to-myocardium contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and navigator efficiency were calculated. RESULTS: Diagnostically interpretable CMRA was obtained successfully in all 16 subjects with FatNAV gating (0% failure rate) and only 14 subjects with DNAV gating (12% failure rate). Compared to DNAV gating, FatNAV gating provided similar SNR and CNR, better image quality (P < 0.01), and 28% improvement in navigator efficiency (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: FatNAV gating provides more effective motion suppression and better image quality than DNAV gating for free-breathing 3D SSFP CMRA of the RCA in healthy subjects. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Elmar Spuentrup; Arno Buecker; Matthias Stuber; Rene Botnar; Trung Hieu Nguyen; Peter Börnert; Christian Kölker; Rolf W Günther Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: W Y Kim; P G Danias; M Stuber; S D Flamm; S Plein; E Nagel; S E Langerak; O M Weber; E M Pedersen; M Schmidt; R M Botnar; W J Manning Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-12-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tevfik F Ismail; Wendy Strugnell; Chiara Coletti; Maša Božić-Iven; Sebastian Weingärtner; Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Correia; Thomas Küstner Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Yan Wen; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Thanh D Nguyen; Zhe Liu; Evelyn M Horn; Harsimran Singh; Jonathan Kochav; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler; Kofi Deh; Jiwon Kim; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang; Pascal Spincemaille Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Jing Liu; Thanh D Nguyen; Yanchun Zhu; Pascal Spincemaille; Martin R Prince; Jonathan W Weinsaft; David Saloner; Yi Wang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 3.240