Literature DB >> 33709327

What you hear first, is what you get: Initial metrical cue presentation modulates syllable detection in sentence processing.

Anna Fiveash1,2, Simone Falk3,4,5, Barbara Tillmann6,7.   

Abstract

Auditory rhythms create powerful expectations for the listener. Rhythmic cues with the same temporal structure as subsequent sentences enhance processing compared with irregular or mismatched cues. In the present study, we focus on syllable detection following matched rhythmic cues. Cues were aligned with subsequent sentences at the syllable (low-level cue) or the accented syllable (high-level cue) level. A different group of participants performed the task without cues to provide a baseline. We hypothesized that unaccented syllable detection would be faster after low-level cues, and accented syllable detection would be faster after high-level cues. There was no difference in syllable detection depending on whether the sentence was preceded by a high-level or low-level cue. However, the results revealed a priming effect of the cue that participants heard first. Participants who heard a high-level cue first were faster to detect accented than unaccented syllables, and faster to detect accented syllables than participants who heard a low-level cue first. The low-level-first participants showed no difference between detection of accented and unaccented syllables. The baseline experiment confirmed that hearing a low-level cue first removed the benefit of the high-level grouping structure for accented syllables. These results suggest that the initially perceived rhythmic structure influenced subsequent cue perception and its influence on syllable detection. Results are discussed in terms of dynamic attending, temporal context effects, and implications for context effects in neural entrainment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attending; Entrainment; Language; Rhythm; Speech; Syllables

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33709327     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02251-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  47 in total

1.  Expectancy, attention, and time.

Authors:  R Barnes; M R Jones
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Sensory versus cognitive components in harmonic priming.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bigand; Bénédicte Poulin; Barbara Tillmann; François Madurell; Daniel A D'Adamo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Matthew Aylett; Alice Turk
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

Review 4.  Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm.

Authors:  Amalia Arvaniti
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Sensitivity to lexical stress in dyslexia: a case of cognitive not perceptual stress.

Authors:  Johanna G Barry; Silke Harbodt; Chiara Cantiani; Beate Sabisch; Oliver Zobay
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2012-05-16

6.  Regular rhythmic primes boost P600 in grammatical error processing in dyslexic adults and matched controls.

Authors:  Laure-Hélène Canette; Anna Fiveash; Jennifer Krzonowski; Alexandra Corneyllie; Philippe Lalitte; Dave Thompson; Laurel Trainor; Nathalie Bedoin; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Rhythm implicitly affects temporal orienting of attention across modalities.

Authors:  Deirdre Bolger; Wiebke Trost; Daniele Schön
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-01-28

8.  Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Laura C Dilley; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Got rhythm…for better and for worse. Cross-modal effects of auditory rhythm on visual word recognition.

Authors:  Renaud Brochard; Maxime Tassin; Daniel Zagar
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-01

10.  Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Michaël Stevens
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2018-01-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.