Literature DB >> 18661954

Analytical characterization of the electrospray ion source in the nanoflow regime.

Ioan Marginean1, Ryan T Kelly, David C Prior, Brian L LaMarche, Keqi Tang, Richard D Smith.   

Abstract

A detailed characterization of a conventional low-flow electrospray ionization (ESI) source for mass spectrometry (MS) using solution compositions typical of reversed-phase liquid chromatography is reported. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the pulsating regime consistently provided better ESI-MS performance than the cone-jet regime for the interface and experimental conditions studied. This observation is supported by additional measurements showing that a conventional heated capillary interface affords more efficient sampling and transmission for the charged aerosol generated by a pulsating electrospray. The pulsating electrospray provided relatively constant MS signal intensities over a wide range of voltages, while the signal decreased slightly with increasing voltage for the cone-jet electrospray. The MS signal also decreased with increasing emitter-interface distance for both pulsating and cone-jet electrosprays due to the expansion of the charged aerosol plume. At flow rates below 100 nL/min, the MS signal increased with increasing flow rate due to increased number of gas-phase ions produced. At flow rates greater than 100 nL/min, the signal reached a plateau due to decreasing ionization efficiency at larger flow rates. These results suggest approaches for improving MS interface performance for low-flow (nano- to micro-) electrosprays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18661954      PMCID: PMC2692497          DOI: 10.1021/ac800683s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  23 in total

1.  Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI?

Authors:  Andrea Schmidt; Michael Karas; Thomas Dülcks
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Efficiency of nano-electrospray ionization.

Authors:  Ayman El-Faramawy; K W Michael Siu; Bruce A Thomson
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Chemically etched open tubular and monolithic emitters for nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ryan T Kelly; Jason S Page; Quanzhou Luo; Ronald J Moore; Daniel J Orton; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Subambient pressure ionization with nanoelectrospray source and interface for improved sensitivity in mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jason S Page; Keqi Tang; Ryan T Kelly; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Micro-electrospray mass spectrometry: Ultra-high-sensitivity analysis of peptides and proteins.

Authors:  M R Emmett; R M Caprioli
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels.

Authors:  A Shevchenko; M Wilm; O Vorm; M Mann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Analytical properties of the nanoelectrospray ion source.

Authors:  M Wilm; M Mann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Charge limits on droplets during evaporation.

Authors:  Kuo-Yen Li; Haohua Tu; Asit K Ray
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Sheathless capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using 10 mu m I.D. capillaries: analyses of tryptic digests of cytochrome c.

Authors:  J H Wahl; D C Gale; R D Smith
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  1994-01-21       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  Physical/chemical separations in the break-up of highly charged droplets from electrosprays.

Authors:  K Tang; R D Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.262

View more
  26 in total

1.  A study of electrospray ionization emitters with differing geometries with respect to flow rate and electrospray voltage.

Authors:  Brent R Reschke; Aaron T Timperman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Optimizing electrospray interfaces using slowly diverging conical duct (ConDuct) electrodes.

Authors:  Andrew N Krutchinsky; Júlio C Padovan; Herbert Cohen; Brian T Chait
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Picoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry using narrow-bore chemically etched emitters.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith; Ryan T Kelly
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Effect of pressure on electrospray characteristics.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Jason S Page; Ryan T Kelly; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  On the ionization and ion transmission efficiencies of different ESI-MS interfaces.

Authors:  Jonathan T Cox; Ioan Marginean; Richard D Smith; Keqi Tang
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Design Characteristics to Eliminate the Need for Parameter Optimization in Nanoflow ESI-MS.

Authors:  Yang Kang; Bradley B Schneider; Leigh Bedford; Thomas R Covey
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Maximizing ion transmission from atmospheric pressure into the vacuum of mass spectrometers with a novel electrospray interface.

Authors:  Andrew N Krutchinsky; Júlio C Padovan; Herbert Cohen; Brian T Chait
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Evolution of the solvent polarity in an electrospray plume.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Renato Zenobi
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Improving FAIMS sensitivity using a planar geometry with slit interfaces.

Authors:  Ridha Mabrouki; Ryan T Kelly; David C Prior; Alexandre A Shvartsburg; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Protein modifications as potential biomarkers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Hongjun Jin; Richard C Zangar
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2009-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.