Literature DB >> 2773730

MR angiography and dynamic flow evaluation of the portal venous system.

R R Edelman1, B Zhao, C Liu, K U Wentz, H P Mattle, J P Finn, C McArdle.   

Abstract

We studied the value of MR angiographic techniques in imaging the portal venous system. Projection angiograms were created by postprocessing a series of two-dimensional, flow-compensated gradient-echo images. Flow velocity was determined by a bolus-tracking method with radiofrequency tagging and multiple data readout periods. Each image was acquired during a breath-hold. MR angiography was applied to six normal subjects and four patients with abnormal hemodynamics in the portal venous system. Flow velocity determined by MR was correlated with the results of duplex sonography. The main portal vein and intrahepatic branches were shown in all cases. Portosystemic collaterals were identified in all patients with portal hypertension. In normal subjects, peak flow velocities (17.9 +/- 2.8 cm/sec) on MR correlated well with values determined by duplex sonography (17.5 +/- 2.2 cm/sec) (r = .846, p less than .04). Reversed portal blood flow was shown in two patients. One patient with portal vein thrombosis had no evidence of flow by MR angiography. Our results indicate that MR angiography can provide a three-dimensional display of normal and abnormal vascular anatomy as well as functional information in the portal venous system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2773730     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.153.4.755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

1.  Basic principles of magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  R R Edelman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Single-shot magnetic resonance imaging: applications to angiography.

Authors:  A P Crawley; M S Cohen; E K Yucel; B Poncelet; T J Brady
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Abdominal magnetic resonance venography.

Authors:  J P Finn; H E Longmaid
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  EUS diagnosis of an unusual case of pylephlebitis mimicking metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Stephan M Wildi; Michael B Wallace; Branden Hunter; Tara C Noone; Brenda J Hoffman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Dose comparison of single versus double dose in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: intra-individual cross-over blinded trial using Gd-DTPA.

Authors:  J T Heverhagen; C L Wright; P Schmalbrock; M V Knopp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Magnetic resonance angiography in the resectability assessment of suspected pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  O Smedby; V Riesenfeld; B Karlson; G Jacobson; A Löfberg; P G Lindgren; H Ahlström
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging and measurement of blood flow.

Authors:  C H McDonnell; R J Herfkens; A M Norbash; G D Rubin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-03

9.  Virtual dye angiography: flow visualization for MRI-guided interventions.

Authors:  Ashvin K George; Anthony Z Faranesh; Kanishka Ratnayaka; J Andrew Derbyshire; Robert J Lederman; Michael S Hansen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Left-sided portal hypertension.

Authors:  Seyfettin Köklü; Sahin Coban; Osman Yüksel; Mehmet Arhan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 3.487

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.