Literature DB >> 18652542

Mid-century controversies in population genetics.

James F Crow1.   

Abstract

Beginning in the 1930s, evolution became an experimental subject. New techniques, especially in Drosophila, made possible quantitative analysis of natural populations. In addition to a large number of studies on many species, there were four major controversies that dominated much of the discussion and experimentation. Some of the arguments were quite heated. These controversies were: Wright vs Fisher on Wright's shifting-balance theory; dominance vs overdominance as an explanation of heterosis; the classical vs balance hypothesis for genetic variability; the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Curiously, most of these issues were not really resolved. Rather they were abandoned in favor of more tractable studies made possible by the new molecular methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18652542     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Genet        ISSN: 0066-4197            Impact factor:   16.830


  15 in total

1.  Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: inbreeding, purging, mutation, and standard selection.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  James F. Crow and the stochastic theory of population genetics.

Authors:  Warren J Ewens
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Characterization of heterotic quantitative trait loci in maize by evaluation of near-isogenic lines and their crosses at two competition levels.

Authors:  Elisabetta Frascaroli; Maria Angela Canè; Mario Enrico Pè; Giorgio Pea; Pierangelo Landi
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 4.  Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis.

Authors:  Z Jeffrey Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato.

Authors:  Uri Krieger; Zachary B Lippman; Dani Zamir
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Toward an Evolutionarily Appropriate Null Model: Jointly Inferring Demography and Purifying Selection.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Brian Charlesworth; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Compensatory evolution in mitochondrial tRNAs navigates valleys of low fitness.

Authors:  Margarita V Meer; Alexey S Kondrashov; Yael Artzy-Randrup; Fyodor A Kondrashov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in uracil-processing genes, intake of one-carbon nutrients and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  C Marian; M Tao; J B Mason; D S Goerlitz; J Nie; A Chanson; J L Freudenheim; P G Shields
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Parallel molecular evolution in an herbivore community.

Authors:  Ying Zhen; Matthew L Aardema; Edgar M Medina; Molly Schumer; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Revisiting an old riddle: what determines genetic diversity levels within species?

Authors:  Ellen M Leffler; Kevin Bullaughey; Daniel R Matute; Wynn K Meyer; Laure Ségurel; Aarti Venkat; Peter Andolfatto; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.