Literature DB >> 18648627

Radiation risk prediction and genetics: the influence of the TP53 gene in vivo.

R E J Mitchel1.   

Abstract

Risk prediction and dose limits for human radiation exposure are based on the assumption that risk is proportional to total dose. However, there is concern about the appropriateness of those limits for people who may be genetically cancer prone. The TP53 gene product functions in regulatory pathways for DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints and apoptosis, processes critical in determining ionizing radiation risk for both carcinogenesis and teratogenesis. Mice that are deficient in TP53 function are cancer prone. This review examines the influence of variations in TP53 gene activity on cancer and teratogenic risk in mice exposed to radiation in vivo, and compares those observations to the assumptions and predictions of radiation risk inherent in the existing system of radiation protection. Current assumptions concerning a linear response with dose, dose additivity, lack of thresholds and dose rate reduction factors all appear incorrect at low doses. TP53 functional variations can further modify radiation risk from either high or low doses, or risk from radiation exposures combined with other stresses, and those modifications can result in both quantitative and qualitative changes in risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TP53; cancer; mice; radiation; risk; teratogenesis

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648627      PMCID: PMC2477197          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.003.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  26 in total

1.  Mutant p53 proteins stimulate spontaneous and radiation-induced intrachromosomal homologous recombination independently of the alteration of the transactivation activity and of the G1 checkpoint.

Authors:  Y Saintigny; D Rouillard; B Chaput; T Soussi; B S Lopez
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-06-17       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Threshold effect for teratogenic risk of radiation depends on dose-rate and p53-dependent apoptosis.

Authors:  F Kato; A Ootsuyama; S Nomoto; S Kondo; T Norimura
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Radiation response of apoptosis in C57BL/6N mouse spleen after whole-body irradiation.

Authors:  A Takahashi; K Ohnishi; I Asakawa; N Kondo; H Nakagawa; M Yonezawa; A Tachibana; H Matsumoto; T Ohnishi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  The adaptive response modifies latency for radiation-induced myeloid leukemia in CBA/H mice.

Authors:  R E Mitchel; J S Jackson; R A McCann; D R Boreham
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  High maternal fever during gestation and severe congenital limb disruptions.

Authors:  M L Martínez-Frías; M J García Mazario; C F Caldas; M P Conejero Gallego; E Bermejo; E Rodríguez-Pinilla
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-01-15

Review 6.  Variation in the human TP53 gene affects old age survival and cancer mortality.

Authors:  Diana van Heemst; Simon P Mooijaart; Marian Beekman; Jeroen Schreuder; Anton J M de Craen; Bernd W Brandt; P Eline Slagboom; Rudi G J Westendorp
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.032

7.  Spontaneous and carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis in p53-deficient mice.

Authors:  M Harvey; M J McArthur; C A Montgomery; J S Butel; A Bradley; L A Donehower
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Upper dose thresholds for radiation-induced adaptive response against cancer in high-dose-exposed, cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel; J S Jackson; S M Carlisle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Hyperthermia as a teratogen: parameters determining hyperthermia-induced head defects in the rat.

Authors:  M A Germain; W S Webster; M J Edwards
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1985-04

10.  The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential.

Authors:  Patrick Dumont; J I-Ju Leu; Anthony C Della Pietra; Donna L George; Maureen Murphy
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-02-03       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  The dose window for radiation-induced protective adaptive responses.

Authors:  Ronald E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Cancer and low dose responses in vivo: implications for radiation protection.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Transcriptional profile of immediate response to ionizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Eric C Rouchka; Robert M Flight; Brigitte H Fasciotto; Rosendo Estrada; John W Eaton; Phani K Patibandla; Sabine J Waigel; Dazhuo Li; John K Kirtley; Palaniappan Sethu; Robert S Keynton
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  Molecular characterization of TP53 gene in human populations exposed to low-dose ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Igor Brasil-Costa; Dayse O Alencar; Milene Raiol-Moraes; Igor A Pessoa; Alexandre W M Brito; Schneyder R Jati; Sidney E B Santos; Rommel M R Burbano; Andrea K C Ribeiro-dos-Santos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.