Literature DB >> 18648564

Requirements for identification of low dose and non-linear mutagenic responses to ionising radiation.

Pamela J Sykes1, Tanya K Day.   

Abstract

Cancer results from multiple changes in gene expression that can occur both genetically and epigenetically. High doses of radiation can lead to mutations and cancer. At high doses the number of mutations caused by radiation is essentially linear with dose. Low dose radiation induced protective responses observed for cancer in vivo and cellular transformation in vitro would predict that hormetic responses would also be observed in mutation assays. Although there are a large number of different mutation assays available, very few are able to detect changes in mutation frequency in response to very low doses of DNA damaging agents. The easiest way to cope with this lack of data in the low dose range is to invoke a linear-no-threshold model for risk assessment. The reasons for the lack of data are discussed. In order to identify hormetic mutation responses, assays need to have a spontaneous frequency that is high enough to enable a reduction below spontaneous frequency to be detected in a feasible number of scored cells and also need to be able to identify both genetic and epigenetic changes. The pKZ1 chromosomal inversion assay fits the criteria for detecting hormetic responses to low dose radiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromosomal inversion; hormesis; low dose ionising radiation; mutation assays; pKZ1 inversion assay

Year:  2007        PMID: 18648564      PMCID: PMC2477715          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.07-018.Sykes

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  17 in total

Review 1.  Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro.

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Defining hormesis.

Authors:  E J Calabrese; L A Baldwin
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Radiation-induced bystander effects: are they good, bad or both?

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Med Confl Surviv       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun

4.  Non-linear chromosomal inversion response in prostate after low dose X-radiation exposure.

Authors:  Guoxin Zeng; Tanya K Day; Antony M Hooker; Benjamin J Blyth; Madhava Bhat; Wayne D Tilley; Pamela J Sykes
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  The adaptive response modifies latency for radiation-induced myeloid leukemia in CBA/H mice.

Authors:  R E Mitchel; J S Jackson; R A McCann; D R Boreham
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  What is a 'low dose' of radiation?

Authors:  V P Bond; L E Feinendegen; J Booz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1988-01

8.  Suppression of thymic lymphoma induction by life-long low-dose-rate irradiation accompanied by immune activation in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ina; Hiroshi Tanooka; Takeshi Yamada; Kazuo Sakai
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Low doses of radiation increase the latency of spontaneous lymphomas and spinal osteosarcomas in cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel; J S Jackson; D P Morrison; S M Carlisle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes induced in vitro by very low doses of X-rays.

Authors:  D C Lloyd; A A Edwards; A Leonard; G L Deknudt; L Verschaeve; A T Natarajan; F Darroudi; G Obe; F Palitti; C Tanzarella
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.694

View more
  4 in total

1.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 2.  Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Vittorio Calabrese; Carolin Cornelius; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Edward J Calabrese; Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Low Radiation Environment Switches the Overgrowth-Induced Cell Apoptosis Toward Autophagy.

Authors:  Mariafausta Fischietti; Emiliano Fratini; Daniela Verzella; Davide Vecchiotti; Daria Capece; Barbara Di Francesco; Giuseppe Esposito; Marco Balata; Luca Ioannuci; Pamela Sykes; Luigi Satta; Francesca Zazzeroni; Alessandra Tessitore; Maria Antonella Tabocchini; Edoardo Alesse
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-01-12

4.  It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection.

Authors:  John J Cardarelli; Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.658

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.