Literature DB >> 16050242

Radiation-induced bystander effects: are they good, bad or both?

Carmel Mothersill1, Colin Seymour.   

Abstract

Our current knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the induction of bystander effects by low dose-low linear-energy-transfer ionising radiation is reviewed, and the question of how bystander effects may be related to observed adaptive responses, systemic genomic instability or other effects of low doses exposures is considered. Bystander effects appear to be the result of a generalised stress response in tissues or cells. The signals may be produced by all exposed cells but the response may require a quoram in order to be expressed. The major response involving low LET radiation exposure discussed in the existing literature is a death response, which has many characteristics of apoptosis but may be detected in cell lines without p53 expression. While a death response might appear to be adverse, it can in fact be protective and remove damaged cells from the population. Since many cell populations carry damaged cells without being exposed to radiation ('background damage') low doses exposures might cause removal of cells damaged by agents other than the test dose of radiation, which would lead to the production of 'u- or n-shaped' dose-response curves. The level of harmful or beneficial response would then be related to the background damage carried by the cell population and the genetic programme determining response to damage. This model may be important when attempting to predict the consequences of mixed exposures involving radiation and other environmental stressors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16050242     DOI: 10.1080/13623690500073398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Confl Surviv        ISSN: 1362-3699


  11 in total

1.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Human lung cancer risks from radon - part I - influence from bystander effects - a microdose analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Methyltransferases mediate cell memory of a genotoxic insult.

Authors:  R E Rugo; J T Mutamba; K N Mohan; T Yee; J R Chaillet; J S Greenberger; B P Engelward
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Rad-by-rad (bit-by-bit): triumph of evidence over activities fostering fear of radiogenic cancers at low doses.

Authors:  J Strzelczyk; W Potter; Z Zdrojewicz
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Requirements for identification of low dose and non-linear mutagenic responses to ionising radiation.

Authors:  Pamela J Sykes; Tanya K Day
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  The impact of the bystander effect on the low-dose hypersensitivity phenomenon.

Authors:  Otilia Nuta; Firouz Darroudi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Comparing the level of bystander effect in a couple of tumor and normal cell lines.

Authors:  Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard; Mohammad T Toossi Bahreyni
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

9.  The role of target and bystander cells in dose-response relationship of radiation-induced bystander effects in two cell lines.

Authors:  Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard; Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi; Ameneh Sazgarnia; Shokoufe Mohebbi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.699

10.  Low Concentration of Exogenous Carbon Monoxide Modulates Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect in Mammalian Cell Cluster Model.

Authors:  Wenqing Wu; Lili Nie; K N Yu; Lijun Wu; Peizhong Kong; Lingzhi Bao; Guodong Chen; Haoran Yang; Wei Han
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.