Literature DB >> 18647341

Selection does not favor larger body size at lower temperature in a seed-feeding beetle.

R Craig Stillwell1, Jordi Moya-Laraño, Charles W Fox.   

Abstract

Body size of many animals increases with increasing latitude, a phenomenon known as Bergmann's rule (Bergmann clines). Latitudinal gradients in mean temperature are frequently assumed to be the underlying cause of this pattern because temperature covaries systematically with latitude, but whether and how temperature mediates selection on body size is unclear. To test the hypothesis that the "relative" advantage of being larger is greatest at cooler temperatures we compare the fitness of replicate lines of the seed beetle, Stator limbatus, for which body size was manipulated via artificial selection ("Large,""Control," and "Small" lines), when raised at low (22 degrees C) and high (34 degrees C) temperatures. Large-bodied beetles (Large lines) took the longest to develop but had the highest lifetime fecundity, and highest fitness (r(C)), at both low and high temperatures. However, the relative difference between the Large and Small lines did not change with temperature (replicate 2) or was greatest at high temperature (replicate 1), contrary to the prediction that the fitness advantage of being large relative to being small will decline with increasing temperature. Our results are consistent with two previous studies of this seed beetle, but inconsistent with prior studies that suggest that temperature-mediated selection on body size is a major contributor to the production of Bergmann clines. We conclude that other environmental and ecological variables that covary with latitude are more likely to produce the gradient in natural selection responsible for generating Bergmann clines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18647341      PMCID: PMC4679199          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00467.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  26 in total

Review 1.  Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data.

Authors:  R J Grissom
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-02

Review 2.  Desiccation and starvation resistance in Drosophila: patterns of variation at the species, population and intrapopulation levels.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; L G Harshman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Ecological and evolutionary diversification of the seed beetle genus Stator (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae).

Authors:  Geoffrey E Morse; Brian D Farrell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  When Rensch meets Bergmann: does sexual size dimorphism change systematically with latitude?

Authors:  Wolf U Blanckenhorn; R Craig Stillwell; Kyle A Young; Charles W Fox; Kyle G Ashton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Smaller beetles are better scramble competitors at cooler temperatures.

Authors:  Jordi Moya-Laraño; Maysaa El Tigani El-Sayyid; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Population differences in host use by a seed-beetle: local adaptation, phenotypic plasticity and maternal effects.

Authors:  Angela R Amarillo-Suárez; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Correlated responses to artificial body size selection in growth, development, phenotypic plasticity and juvenile viability in yellow dung flies.

Authors:  Y Teuschl; C Reim; W U Blanckenhorn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Geoffrey E Morse; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Phenotypic plasticity in a complex world: interactive effects of food and temperature on fitness components of a seed beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; William G Wallin; Lisa J Hitchcock; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; E Beecham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  6 in total

1.  Are latitudinal clines in body size adaptive?

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell
Journal:  Oikos       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.903

2.  Natural selection on body size is mediated by multiple interacting factors: a comparison of beetle populations varying naturally and experimentally in body size.

Authors:  Angela R Amarillo-Suárez; R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Dormancy cues alter insect temperature-size relationships.

Authors:  Sharon F Clemmensen; Daniel A Hahn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Distribution and predictors of wing shape and size variability in three sister species of solitary bees.

Authors:  Simon Dellicour; Maxence Gerard; Jérôme G Prunier; Alexandre Dewulf; Michael Kuhlmann; Denis Michez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of Pre-Diapause Temperature and Body Weight on the Diapause Intensity of the Overwintering Generation of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Authors:  Zhixiong Zhou; Xiaolin Dong; Qi Su; Zhenzhou Xia; Zailing Wang; Jiangjiang Yuan; Chuanren Li
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 1.857

6.  Seasonal variation in wing size and shape of Drosophila melanogaster reveals rapid adaptation to environmental changes.

Authors:  Banu Şebnem Önder; Cansu Fidan Aksoy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.