Literature DB >> 17210003

Correlated responses to artificial body size selection in growth, development, phenotypic plasticity and juvenile viability in yellow dung flies.

Y Teuschl1, C Reim, W U Blanckenhorn.   

Abstract

Most life history traits are positively influenced by body size, whereas disadvantages of large body size are poorly documented. To investigate presumed intrinsic costs of large size in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria; Diptera: Scathophagidae), we established two replicates each of three body size laboratory selection lines (small, control and large; selection on males only), and subjected flies of the resulting extended body size range to various abiotic stresses. Response to selection was symmetrical in the small and large lines (realized h(2) = 0.16-0.18). After 24 generations of selection body size had changed by roughly 10%. Female size showed a correlated response to selection on male size, whereas sexual size dimorphism did not change. Development time also showed a correlated response as, similar to food limited flies, small line flies emerged earlier at smaller body size. At the lowest larval food limit possible, flies of all lines emerged at the same small body size after roughly the same development time; so overall phenotypic plasticity in body size and development time strongly increased following selection. Juvenile mortality increased markedly when food was extremely limited, large line flies showing highest mortality. Winter frost disproportionately killed large (line) flies because of their longer development times. Mortality at high temperatures was high but size-selective effects were inconsistent. In all environments the larger males suffered more. Initial growth rate was higher for males and at unlimited food. Small line individuals of both sexes grew slowest at unlimited larval food but fastest at limited larval food, suggesting a physiological cost of fast growth. Overall, extension of the natural body size range by artificial selection revealed some otherwise cryptic intrinsic juvenile viability costs of large size, mediated by longer development or faster growth, but only in stressful environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17210003     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01225.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  11 in total

1.  Heritability and adaptive phenotypic plasticity of adult body size in the mosquito Aedes aegypti with implications for dengue vector competence.

Authors:  Jennifer R Schneider; Dave D Chadee; Akio Mori; Jeanne Romero-Severson; David W Severson
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.342

2.  Why get big in the cold? Towards a solution to a life-history puzzle.

Authors:  Isabell Karl; Klaus Fischer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Selection does not favor larger body size at lower temperature in a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Jordi Moya-Laraño; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Alternative mating tactics in the yellow dung fly: resolving mechanisms of small-male advantage off pasture.

Authors:  Brian E Gress; Ryan J Waltzer; Stefan Lüpold; Elizabeth M Droge-Young; Mollie K Manier; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Tiit Teder; Goggy Davidowitz; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Untangling the positive genetic correlation between rainbow trout growth and survival.

Authors:  Harri Vehviläinen; Antti Kause; Hanna Kuukka-Anttila; Heikki Koskinen; Tuija Paananen
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 7.  A review of the natural history and laboratory culture methods for the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria.

Authors:  W U Blanckenhorn; A J Pemberton; L F Bussière; J Roembke; K D Floate
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

8.  Natural selection on body size is mediated by multiple interacting factors: a comparison of beetle populations varying naturally and experimentally in body size.

Authors:  Angela R Amarillo-Suárez; R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  The role of sexual selection and conflict in mediating among-population variation in mating strategies and sexually dimorphic traits in Sepsis punctum.

Authors:  Caitlin Dmitriew; Wolf U Blanckenhorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Caterpillars selected for large body size and short development time are more susceptible to oxygen-related stress.

Authors:  Jon F Harrison; Arianne J Cease; John M Vandenbrooks; Todd Albert; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.