Literature DB >> 17879187

Geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle.

R Craig Stillwell1, Geoffrey E Morse, Charles W Fox.   

Abstract

Body size of many animals varies with latitude: body size is either larger at higher latitudes (Bergmann's rule) or smaller at higher latitudes (converse Bergmann's rule). However, the causes underlying these patterns are poorly understood. Also, studies rarely explore how sexual size dimorphism varies with latitude. Here we investigate geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of the seed-feeding beetle Stator limbatus, collected from 95 locations along a 38 degrees range in latitude. We examine 14 variables to test whether clines in environmental factors are adequate to explain geographic patterns of body size. We found that body size and sexual size dimorphism of S. limbatus varied considerably with latitude; beetles were smaller but more dimorphic at lower latitudes. Body size was not correlated with a gradient in mean temperature, contrary to the commonly accepted hypothesis that clines are produced by latitudinal gradients in temperature. Instead, we found that three factors were adequate to explain the cline in body size: clinal variation in host plant seed size, moisture (humidity), and seasonality (variance in humidity, precipitation, and temperature). We also found that the cline in sexual size dimorphism was partially explainable by a gradient in moisture, though moisture alone was not sufficient to explain the cline. Other ecological or environmental variables must necessarily contribute to differences in selection on male versus female body size. The main implications of our study are that the sexes differ in the magnitude of clinal variation in body size, creating latitudinal variation in sexual size dimorphism, and that clines in body size of seed beetles are likely influenced by variation in host seed size, water availability, and seasonality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879187     DOI: 10.1086/520118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  25 in total

1.  Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity of a mechanism that controls body size: implications for sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Smaller beetles are better scramble competitors at cooler temperatures.

Authors:  Jordi Moya-Laraño; Maysaa El Tigani El-Sayyid; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Small worker bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) are hardier against starvation than their larger sisters.

Authors:  M J Couvillon; A Dornhaus
Journal:  Insectes Soc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.643

4.  No evidence that warmer temperatures are associated with selection for smaller body sizes.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Michael B Morrissey; Stephanie M Carlson; Clinton D Francis; Joel G Kingsolver; Kenneth D Whitney; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Ontogeny of worker body size distribution in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies.

Authors:  Margaret J Couvillon; Jennifer M Jandt; Nhi Duong; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.465

6.  Effects of pathogen exposure on life-history variation in the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar).

Authors:  D J Páez; A E Fleming-Davies; G Dwyer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Selection does not favor larger body size at lower temperature in a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Jordi Moya-Laraño; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Are latitudinal clines in body size adaptive?

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell
Journal:  Oikos       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.903

Review 9.  Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Tiit Teder; Goggy Davidowitz; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 19.686

10.  Adaptive dynamics of cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila.

Authors:  S Rajpurohit; R Hanus; V Vrkoslav; E L Behrman; A O Bergland; D Petrov; J Cvačka; P S Schmidt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.