Literature DB >> 10710850

Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data.

R J Grissom1.   

Abstract

Traditional parametric (t, F) and nonparametric (Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon U, Kruskal-Wallis H) statistics are sensitive to heterogeneity of variance (heteroscedasticity). Moreover, there are theoretical reasons to expect, and empirical results to document, the existence of heteroscedasticity in clinical data. Transformations to reduce heteroscedasticity are problematic. This article reviews the literature on robust methods that are available and that should be widely used to control rate of Type I error and maintain power. No one robust method is ideal for all situations, but such methods are superior to the traditional tests. Specific recommendations are made for application under various conditions of heteroscedasticity.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10710850     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.68.1.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  13 in total

1.  Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity of a mechanism that controls body size: implications for sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Automatic Bayes Factors for Testing Equality- and Inequality-Constrained Hypotheses on Variances.

Authors:  Florian Böing-Messing; Joris Mulder
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Confidence interval estimation for standardized effect sizes in multilevel and latent growth modeling.

Authors:  Alan Feingold
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-09-01

4.  Robust mediation analysis based on median regression.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; David P Mackinnon
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2013-09-30

5.  A brief motivational intervention for physically aggressive dating couples.

Authors:  Erica M Woodin; K Daniel O'Leary
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2010-12

6.  Selection does not favor larger body size at lower temperature in a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Jordi Moya-Laraño; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Maximin Efficiencies under Treatment-Dependent Costs and Outcome Variances for Parallel, AA/BB, and AB/BA Designs.

Authors:  Math J J M Candel
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Efficient design of cluster randomized trials with treatment-dependent costs and treatment-dependent unknown variances.

Authors:  Gerard J P van Breukelen; Math J J M Candel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  A simple statistic for comparing moderation of slopes and correlations.

Authors:  Michael Smithson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-09

10.  A systematic approach to designing statistically powerful heteroscedastic 2 × 2 factorial studies while minimizing financial costs.

Authors:  Show-Li Jan; Gwowen Shieh
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.