Literature DB >> 18639550

High-resolution manometry and impedance-pH/manometry: valuable tools in clinical and investigational esophagology.

Peter J Kahrilas1, Daniel Sifrim.   

Abstract

Both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and impedance-pH/manometry monitoring have established themselves as research tools and both are now emerging in the clinical arena. Solid-state HRM capable of simultaneously monitoring the entire pressure profile from the pharynx to the stomach along with pressure topography plotting represents an evolution in esophageal manometry. Two strengths of HRM with pressure topography plots compared with conventional manometric recordings are (1) accurately delineating and tracking the movement of functionally defined contractile elements of the esophagus and its sphincters, and (2) easily distinguishing between luminal pressurization attributable to spastic contractions and that resultant from a trapped bolus in a dysfunctional esophagus. Making these distinctions objectifies the identification of achalasia, distal esophageal spasm, functional obstruction, and subtypes thereof. Ambulatory intraluminal impedance pH monitoring has opened our eyes to the trafficking of much more than acid reflux through the esophageal lumen. It is clear that acid reflux as identified by a conventional pH electrode represents only a subset of reflux events with many more reflux episodes being composed of less acidic and gaseous mixtures. This has prompted many investigations into the genesis of refractory reflux symptoms. However, with both technologies, the challenge has been to make sense of the vastly expanded datasets. At the very least, HRM is a major technological tweak on conventional manometry, and impedance pH monitoring yields information above and beyond that gained from conventional pH monitoring studies. Ultimately, however, both technologies will be strengthened as outcome studies evaluating their utilization become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639550      PMCID: PMC2892006          DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  99 in total

1.  Impedance characteristics of normal oesophageal motor function.

Authors:  Huan N Nguyen; Gerson R Domingues; Ron Winograd; Patrick Koppitz; Frank Lammert; Jiri Silny; Siegfried Matern
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  Physical and pH properties of gastroesophagopharyngeal refluxate: a 24-hour simultaneous ambulatory impedance and pH monitoring study.

Authors:  Osamu Kawamura; Muhammad Aslam; Tanya Rittmann; Candy Hofmann; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; W J Dodds; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Baclofen decreases acid and non-acid post-prandial gastro-oesophageal reflux measured by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH.

Authors:  M F Vela; R Tutuian; P O Katz; D O Castell
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Intrabolus pressure gradient identifies pathological constriction in the upper esophageal sphincter during flow.

Authors:  Anupam Pal; Rohan B Williams; Ian J Cook; James G Brasseur
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 4.052

6.  Relevance of ineffective oesophageal motility during oesophageal acid clearance.

Authors:  M Simrén; J Silny; R Holloway; J Tack; J Janssens; D Sifrim
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Nagammapudur S Balaji; James L Wise; Joseph A Murray; Jeffrey H Peters; Steven S Shay; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function abnormalities: study in 350 patients.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Rumination documented by using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  38 in total

1.  Interobserver variability in esophageal body measurements with high-resolution manometry among new physician users.

Authors:  Erick Raj Singh; Christopher Rife; Steven Clayton; Peter Naas; Paul Nietert; Donald O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Quantitative differences between primary and secondary peristaltic contractions of the esophagus.

Authors:  Donghua Liao; Anne Lund Krarup; Flemming Holbæk Lundager; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Distal contraction latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography studies.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  The clinical usefulness of high-resolution manometry for the management of achalasia.

Authors:  Marcelo F Vela
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-06

Review 5.  Evaluation of patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux: a practical approach.

Authors:  Anas Abou-Ismail; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-06

6.  Impact of thoracic surgery on esophageal motor function-Evaluation by high resolution manometry.

Authors:  Anja Wäsche; Arne Kandulski; Peter Malfertheiner; Sandra Riedel; Patrick Zardo; Thomas Hachenberg; Jens Schreiber
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Insight Into the Relationship Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Asthma.

Authors:  Fehmi Ates; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-11

8.  The value of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of the resting characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joerg Zehetner; Oliver Ross; Calvin Wu; Arzu Oezcelik; Emmanuele Abate; Helen J Sohn; Farzaneh Banki; John C Lipham; Steven R DeMeester; Tom R Demeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  The role of weakly acidic reflux in proton pump inhibitor failure, has dust settled?

Authors:  Emmanouela Tsoukali; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 10.  A controversy that has been tough to swallow: is the treatment of achalasia now digested?

Authors:  Garrett R Roll; Charlotte Rabl; Ruxandra Ciovica; Sofia Peeva; Guilherme M Campos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.