Literature DB >> 24682721

Quantitative differences between primary and secondary peristaltic contractions of the esophagus.

Donghua Liao1, Anne Lund Krarup, Flemming Holbæk Lundager, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Hans Gregersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Differences in contraction characteristics between primary and secondary peristalsis have only been scarcely studied. Recently new measures of contractile activity in the human esophagus were developed. The study aims were to use combined manometry and impedance planimetry [pressure-cross-sectional area (P-CSA)] recordings from healthy volunteers to examine esophageal peristalsis, and, furthermore, to investigate the effect of the motility enhancing drug erythromycin to study differential effects on the two types of contractions.
METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated in the study [mean age 23 (range, 19-34) years, 6 females]. An esophageal probe with a bag for CSA measurement was positioned 10 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. Bag volume was increased stepwise from 5 to 25 ml before and after intravenous infusion of 250 mg erythromycin. Swallow-evoked primary and distension-evoked secondary esophageal peristalsis were compared with regard to (1) pressure amplitude, (2) CSA amplitude, (3) preload tension (wall tension before an evoked contraction), (4) contractile tension, and (5) work outputs.
RESULTS: Primary peristalsis induced more efficient contractions as the contraction amplitudes, work output and contractile tension were higher compared to secondary peristalsis (P < 0.001). Erythromycin induced change in CSA during distension-evoked secondary peristalsis (CSA before 212.9 ± 26.8 vs. after 180.5 ± 23.3, P < 0.05). The sensitivity to esophageal distension increased with the distending volume both before and during erythromycin. The sensitivity was not changed by erythromycin (P = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal primary peristaltic contractions were more forceful with longer duration, and higher work output compared to secondary peristalsis contractions. Erythromycin affected peristalsis only to a minor degree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24682721     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3070-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  16 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy and physiology of the enteric nervous system.

Authors:  M Costa; S J Brookes; G W Hennig
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Nonspecific motility disorders, irritable esophagus, and chest pain.

Authors:  Anne Lund Krarup; Donghua Liao; Hans Gregersen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Reza A Hejazi; Richard W McCallum; Kenneth J Vega; Marzio Frazzoni; Leonardo Frazzoni; John O Clarke; Sami R Achem
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Effects of oral erythromycin on upper gastrointestinal motility in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  C H Kao; S J Wang; D Y Pang
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.690

4.  Stimulation and characteristics of secondary oesophageal peristalsis in normal subjects.

Authors:  M N Schoeman; R H Holloway
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Mechanical characteristics of distension-evoked peristaltic contractions in the esophagus of systemic sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Hans Gregersen; Gerda E Villadsen; Donghua Liao
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The esophageal propulsive force: esophageal response to acute obstruction.

Authors:  D H Winship; F F Zboralske
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Improvement of esophageal and gastric motility after 2-week treatment of oral erythromycin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Chwen Tzuei Chang; Yu-Chien Shiau; Cheng-Chieh Lin; Tsai-Chung Li; Cheng-Chung Lee; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.852

8.  Secondary oesophageal peristalsis in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia.

Authors:  M N Schoeman; R H Holloway
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  High-resolution manometry and impedance-pH/manometry: valuable tools in clinical and investigational esophagology.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  The effect of intravenous erythromycin on esophageal motility in healthy subjects.

Authors:  G Tzovaras; E Xynos; E Chrysos; A Mantides; J S Vassilakis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  3 in total

1.  Utilizing functional lumen imaging probe topography to evaluate esophageal contractility during volumetric distention: a pilot study.

Authors:  D A Carlson; Z Lin; M C Rogers; C Y Lin; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Assessment of esophageal body peristaltic work using functional lumen imaging probe panometry.

Authors:  Shashank Acharya; Sourav Halder; Dustin A Carlson; Wenjun Kou; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 3.  What Is the Future of Impedance Planimetry in Gastroenterology?

Authors:  Hans Gregersen; Kar Man Lo
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.