Literature DB >> 18639431

Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus.

Harlan C Amstutz1, Michel J Le Duff.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing is currently the fastest growing hip procedure worldwide. We reviewed 1000 hips in 838 patients who received a Conserve Plus (Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Arlington, Tenn) resurfacing at a single institution. The mean age of the patients was 50.0 years with 74.7% male. The hips were resurfaced irrespective of femoral defect size or etiology. The mean follow-up was 5.6 years (range, 1.1-11.0 years). All clinical scores improved significantly (P < .05). There was no acetabular component loosening. Ten were converted to total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, 20 for femoral loosening, 2 for sepsis, and 1 for recurrent subluxations. The 5-year survivorship was 95.2% with no failures in hips implanted since 2002. Short-term failures can be prevented. First-generation surgical technique and a low body mass index were the most important risk factors for the procedure. Improvements in bone preparation significantly increased prosthetic survival in hips with risk factors for failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639431     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  39 in total

1.  Cementation and interface analysis of early failure cases after hip-resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Krause; Stefan Breer; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael M Morlock; Michael Amling; Jozef Zustin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Survival of hard-on-hard bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Siraj A Sayeed; Aaron J Johnson; Thomas P Schmalzried; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu; Lee Webb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Katherine M Bedigrew; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Cementing the metaphyseal stem in metal-on-metal resurfacing: when and why.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Hip resurfacing results for osteonecrosis are as good as for other etiologies at 2 to 12 years.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system-a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips.

Authors:  Thomas Baad-Hansen; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  [Metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing. Development and current state].

Authors:  M Hoberg; M J Le Duff; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  [Endoprostheses in the elderly : Biomaterials, implant selection and fixation technique].

Authors:  M M Morlock; M Jäger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  Failed internal fixation due to osteonecrosis following traumatic periprosthetic fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jozef Zustin; Eugen Winter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.