Literature DB >> 19756906

Hip resurfacing results for osteonecrosis are as good as for other etiologies at 2 to 12 years.

Harlan C Amstutz1, Michel J Le Duff.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A bone-conserving prosthetic solution, such as hip resurfacing arthroplasty, is desirable for patients with osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head because of their young age. However, many surgeons are reluctant to perform hip resurfacing for ON because of large femoral head defects. To ascertain whether this reluctance is warranted, we determined the mid- to long-term effects of ON on the survivorship, radiographic implant fixation, and disease-specific and quality-of-life scores of hip resurfacing. We compared the results of metal-on-metal resurfacing performed for ON of the hip (including large lesions) with those of resurfacing performed for other causes. The ON group had 70 patients (85 hips) and the control group 768 patients (915 hips) including all other etiologies operated on during the same period. The ON group was younger and had a greater incidence of femoral defects, a smaller component size, and a lower body mass index, three variables previously shown to reduce survivorship in hip resurfacing. We observed no difference in survivorship between the ON group and the control group even after adjusting for head size, body mass index, and defect size. Pain relief, walking, and function scores were comparable postoperatively. The activity level was lower in the ON group. Our data suggest ON is not a contraindication for resurfacing even with large femoral head defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19756906      PMCID: PMC2806980          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1077-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  25 in total

1.  The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff; Patricia A Campbell; Frederick J Dorey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Cementing the metaphyseal stem in metal-on-metal resurfacing: when and why.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

Authors:  A F Brooker; J W Bowerman; R A Robinson; L H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; B J Thomas; R Jinnah; W Kim; T Grogan; C Yale
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A comparison of osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis patients following total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  M A Ritter; J B Meding
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A comparison with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  S Saito; M Saito; T Nishina; K Ohzono; K Ono
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Impact of implant design on femoral head hemiresurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael J Grecula; John A Thomas; Stefan W Kreuzer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients.

Authors:  Michel J Le Duff; Harlan C Amstutz; Frederick J Dorey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  13 in total

1.  Hip resurfacing in patients who have osteonecrosis and are 25 years or under.

Authors:  Siraj A Sayeed; Aaron J Johnson; D Alex Stroh; Thomas P Gross; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: Does the extent of osteonecrosis affect the survival of hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.

Authors:  Md Quamar Azam; Stephen McMahon; Gabrielle Hawdon; Sukesh Rao Sankineani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Osteonecrosis of the Shoulders in Pediatric Patients Treated for Leukemia or Lymphoma: Single-Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Sue C Kaste; Brian M DeFeo; Michael D Neel; Kenneth S Weiss; Israel Fernandez-Pineda; Kiri K Ness
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 5.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01

6.  Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  Does the extent of osteonecrosis affect the survival of hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Satoshi Nakasone; Masaki Takao; Takashi Sakai; Takashi Nishii; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mid- to long-term results of resurfacing hip arthroplasty in Japanese patients: a comparison of osteoarthritic vs non-osteoarthritic patients.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Tamon Kabata; Yoshitomo Kajino; Tomoharu Takagi; Takaaki Ohmori; Junya Yoshitani; Takuro Ueno; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  Total hip arthroplasty in advanced osteonecrosis: the short-term results by metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Firooz Madadi; Alireza Eajazi; Seyyed Morteza Kazemi; Armin Aalami Harandi; Firoozeh Madadi; Seyyed Reza Sharifzadeh
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-02

10.  The effects of necrotic lesion size and orientation of the femoral component on stress alterations in the proximal femur in hip resurfacing - a finite element simulation.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Tai; Yung-Chou Chen; Pang-Hsin Hsieh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.