Literature DB >> 20625118

Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer: a phase II study.

Lance C Pagliaro1, Dallas L Williams, Danai Daliani, Michael B Williams, William Osai, Michael Kincaid, Sijin Wen, Peter F Thall, Curtis A Pettaway.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Men with penile squamous cell carcinoma and regional lymph node involvement have a low probability of survival with lymphadenectomy alone. A multimodal approach to treatment is desirable for such patients. We performed a phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the objective of determining the response rate, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) among patients with bulky adenopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had stage N2 or N3 (stage III or stage IV) penile cancer without distant metastases. Neoadjuvant treatment (four courses every 3-4 weeks) consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) administered over 3 hours on day 1; ifosfamide 1,200 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3; and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3. Clinical and pathologic responses were assessed, and patient groups were compared for TTP and OS.
RESULTS: Thirty men received chemotherapy of whom 15 (50.0%) had an objective response and 22 (73.3%) subsequently underwent surgery. Three patients had no remaining tumor on histopathology. Nine patients (30.0%) remained alive and free of recurrence (median follow-up, 34 months; range, 14-59 months), and two patients died of other causes without recurrence. Improved TTP and OS were significantly associated with a response to chemotherapy (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively), absence of bilateral residual tumor (P = .002 and P = .017, respectively), and absence of extranodal extension (P = .001 and P = .004, respectively) or skin involvement (P = .009 and P = .012, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The neoadjuvant regimen of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin induced clinically meaningful responses in patients with bulky regional lymph node metastases from penile cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20625118      PMCID: PMC2940402          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.5477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  25 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Postoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eric Winquist; Tom Oliver; Ralph Gilbert
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Prognostic factors in node-positive carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Durgatosh Pandey; Vikash Mahajan; R Ravi Kannan
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by aggressive surgical consolidation for metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Carlos Bermejo; J Erik Busby; Philippe E Spiess; Lior Heller; Lance C Pagliaro; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Joost A P Leijte; J Martijn Kerst; Evert Bais; Ninja Antonini; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  A phase II multicentre study of irinotecan (CPT 11) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in metastatic or locally advanced penile carcinoma (EORTC PROTOCOL 30992).

Authors:  C Theodore; I Skoneczna; I Bodrogi; M Leahy; J M Kerst; L Collette; K Ven; S Marréaud; R D T Oliver
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Radiation therapy in the management of the primary penile tumor: an update.

Authors:  Juanita Crook; Clement Ma; Laval Grimard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Antonio Galfano; Vincenzo De Marco; Walter Artibani; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2007-03

Review 10.  Penile cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention.

Authors:  M C G Bleeker; D A M Heideman; P J F Snijders; S Horenblas; J Dillner; C J L M Meijer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.661

View more
  72 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Gregory J Diorio; Curtis Pettaway; Viraj Master; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Penile cancer: Targeted therapy in penile cancer: a new treatment paradigm.

Authors:  Mounsif Azizi; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Advanced penile cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan E Heinlen; David D Buethe; Daniel Joseph Culkin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  [Neoadjuvant, adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy of penile cancer].

Authors:  C Protzel; A K Seitz; O W Hakenberg; M Retz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Current Management Strategy for Penile Cancer and Future Directions.

Authors:  Tanya B Dorff; Leslie K Ballas; Anne K Schuckman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Management of carcinoma of the penis: Consensus statement from the Canadian Association of Genitourinary Medical Oncologists (CAGMO).

Authors:  Suzanne Richter; J Dean Ruether; Lori Wood; Christina Canil; Patricia Moretto; Peter Venner; Joel Gingerich; Urban Emmenegger; Andrea Eisen; Pawel Zalewski; Anthony Joshua; Som Dave Mukherjee; Daniel Heng; Piotr Czaykowski; Denis Soulieres; Norman Blais; Ricardo Rendon; Neil Fleshner; Juanita M Crook; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Bradley C Carthon; Chaan S Ng; Curtis A Pettaway; Lance C Pagliaro
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Contemporary management of penile cancer: greater than 15 year MSKCC experience.

Authors:  Kelvin A Moses; Andrew Winer; John P Sfakianos; Stephen A Poon; Matthew Kent; Melanie Bernstein; Paul Russo; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.344

10.  Lymph node metastases and prognosis in penile cancer.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.