Literature DB >> 17850372

A 10-year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK.

Tina Mistry1, Rob W A Jones, Erica Dannatt, Krishna K Prasad, Andrew D Stockdale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of approximately 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the European Associations of Urology guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with or treated for penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network over a 10-year period were identified retrospectively, and data relating to histology, local treatment, lymph node management, outcome and survival were recorded.
RESULTS: Data were obtained for 65 patients; 61 (94%) had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, equating to approximately 0.6 cases per 100 000 population per year. Their mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Of SCCs, 86% were located on the glans and/or foreskin. Thirty-six patients had conservative primary local therapy, mostly for T0 or T1 disease. The 5-year relapse-free survival after radiotherapy was 63%, although survival after salvage penectomy was 75% at 4 years. Forty-seven patients had lymph node surveillance; 11 developed lymph node disease and had lymph node dissection (LND) with or with no radiotherapy, but survival was poor. Primary inguinal LND with or without radiotherapy was used in eight patients, and was associated with a good survival, although three were found to have negative histology after LND. Survival was strongly influenced by T and N stage at presentation and the 5-year survival for the whole group was 71%.
CONCLUSION: The workload, incidence and overall mortality from penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network are in line with those in the rest of the UK. Rates of conservative therapy were good in this group and associated with good survival. Survival could be improved by identifying and aggressively treating those patients at high risk of lymph node disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850372     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07168.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  17 in total

1.  Management of carcinoma of the penis: Consensus statement from the Canadian Association of Genitourinary Medical Oncologists (CAGMO).

Authors:  Suzanne Richter; J Dean Ruether; Lori Wood; Christina Canil; Patricia Moretto; Peter Venner; Joel Gingerich; Urban Emmenegger; Andrea Eisen; Pawel Zalewski; Anthony Joshua; Som Dave Mukherjee; Daniel Heng; Piotr Czaykowski; Denis Soulieres; Norman Blais; Ricardo Rendon; Neil Fleshner; Juanita M Crook; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Penile cancer: current therapy and future directions.

Authors:  G Sonpavde; L C Pagliaro; C Buonerba; T B Dorff; R J Lee; G Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  The development of a supraregional network for the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  P Kumar; S Singh; J C Goddard; T R Terry; D J Summerton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Carcinoma Penis-Observation or Surgery?

Authors:  Syed Althaf; Rajkumar P Narayanakar; Dinesh M Gangaiah; Kapil Dev; Vishnu P Kurpad; Jaiprakash Gurawalia
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

5.  Penile Carcinoma in Northern Trinidad and Tobago.

Authors:  M J Ramdass; V Naraynsingh; Q Young-Sing; J Mooteeram; S Barrow
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 0.171

Review 6.  [Value of targeted therapy for penile cancer].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; D Thüer; D Pfister
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  [Characterization of the EGF receptor status in penile cancer : retrospective analysis of the course of the disease in 45 patients].

Authors:  C Börgermann; K J Schmitz; S Sommer; H Rübben; S Krege
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Penile preserving surgery and surgical strategies to maximize penile form and function in penile cancer: recommendations from the United Kingdom experience.

Authors:  Paul K Hegarty; Majid Shabbir; Ben Hughes; Suks Minhas; Matthew Perry; Nicholas Watkin; David J Ralph
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Radiation therapy in the management of the primary penile tumor: an update.

Authors:  Juanita Crook; Clement Ma; Laval Grimard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Penis auto-amputation and chasm of the lower abdominal wall due to advanced penile carcinoma: a case report.

Authors:  Dimitrios Baltogiannis; Konstantinos Zotos; Stavros Tsambalas; Dimitrios Giannakis; Nikolaos Sofikitis
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2011-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.