Literature DB >> 18635895

Intensity-modulated x-ray (IMXT) versus proton (IMPT) therapy for theragnostic hypoxia-based dose painting.

Ryan T Flynn1, Stephen R Bowen, Søren M Bentzen, T Rockwell Mackie, Robert Jeraj.   

Abstract

In this work the abilities of intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to deliver boosts based on theragnostic imaging were assessed. Theragnostic imaging is the use of functional or molecular imaging data for prescribing radiation dose distributions. Distal gradient tracking, an IMPT method designed for the delivery of non-uniform dose distributions, was assessed. Dose prescriptions for a hypoxic region in a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patient were designed to either uniformly boost the region or redistribute the dose based on positron emission tomography (PET) images of the (61)Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(N(4)-methylthiosemicarbazone) ((61)Cu-ATSM) hypoxia surrogate. Treatment plans for the prescriptions were created for four different delivery methods: IMXT delivered with step-and-shoot and with helical tomotherapy, and IMPT delivered with spot scanning and distal gradient tracking. IMXT and IMPT delivered comparable dose distributions within the boost region for both uniform and redistributed theragnostic boosts. Normal tissue integral dose was lower by a factor of up to 3 for IMPT relative to the IMXT. For all delivery methods, the mean dose to the nearby organs at risk changed by less than 2 Gy for redistributed versus uniform boosts. The distal gradient tracking method resulted in comparable plans to the spot scanning method while reducing the number of proton beam spots by a factor of over 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18635895      PMCID: PMC2695924          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/15/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  46 in total

1.  Iterative approaches to dose optimization in tomotherapy.

Authors:  D M Shepard; G H Olivera; P J Reckwerdt; T R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Copper-62-ATSM: a new hypoxia imaging agent with high membrane permeability and low redox potential.

Authors:  Y Fujibayashi; H Taniuchi; Y Yonekura; H Ohtani; J Konishi; A Yokoyama
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Oxygen distribution in squamous cell carcinoma metastases and its relationship to outcome of radiation therapy.

Authors:  R A Gatenby; H B Kessler; J S Rosenblum; L R Coia; P J Moldofsky; W H Hartz; G J Broder
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Photon beam convolution using polyenergetic energy deposition kernels.

Authors:  P W Hoban; D C Murray; W H Round
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Optimization of tumour control probability in hypoxic tumours by radiation dose redistribution: a modelling study.

Authors:  Aste Søvik; Eirik Malinen; Øyvind S Bruland; Søren M Bentzen; Dag Rune Olsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Endogenous markers of hypoxia/anaerobic metabolism and anemia in primary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Michael I Koukourakis; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Alexandros Polychronidis; Costantinos Simopoulos; Kevin C Gatter; Adrian L Harris; Efthimios Sivridis
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization.

Authors:  E Pedroni; R Bacher; H Blattmann; T Böhringer; A Coray; A Lomax; S Lin; G Munkel; S Scheib; U Schneider
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators.

Authors:  T R Bortfeld; D L Kahler; T J Waldron; A L Boyer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Adapting radiotherapy to hypoxic tumours.

Authors:  Eirik Malinen; Aste Søvik; Dimitre Hristov; Øyvind S Bruland; Dag Rune Olsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Prognostic impact of hypoxia imaging with 18F-misonidazole PET in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer before radiotherapy.

Authors:  Susanne-Martina Eschmann; Frank Paulsen; Matthias Reimold; Helmut Dittmann; Stefan Welz; Gerald Reischl; Hans-Juergen Machulla; Roland Bares
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  28 in total

1.  A phantom model demonstration of tomotherapy dose painting delivery, including managed respiratory motion without motion management.

Authors:  Michael W Kissick; Xiaohu Mo; Keisha C McCall; Leah K Schubert; David C Westerly; Thomas R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  18F-FET-PET-based dose painting by numbers with protons.

Authors:  Mark Rickhey; Zdenek Morávek; Christoph Eilles; Oliver Koelbl; Ludwig Bogner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Differential hepatic avoidance radiation therapy: Proof of concept in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Stephen R Bowen; Jatinder Saini; Tobias R Chapman; Robert S Miyaoka; Paul E Kinahan; George A Sandison; Tony Wong; Hubert J Vesselle; Matthew J Nyflot; Smith Apisarnthanarax
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Proton beam therapy for locally advanced and unresectable (T4bN0M0) squamous cell carcinoma of the ethmoid sinus: A report of seven cases and a literature review.

Authors:  Takashi Saito; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Kayoko Ohnishi; Teruhito Aihara; Masashi Mizumoto; Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu; Kaori Sugawara; Toshiyuki Okumura; Hideyuki Sakurai
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  The potential benefit of radiotherapy with protons in head and neck cancer with respect to normal tissue sparing: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Tara A van de Water; Hendrik P Bijl; Cornelis Schilstra; Madelon Pijls-Johannesma; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-02-24

6.  Technical Note: Optimization of spot and trimmer position during dynamically collimated proton therapy.

Authors:  Blake R Smith; Daniel E Hyer; Ryan T Flynn; Wesley S Culberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Technical Note: A treatment plan comparison between dynamic collimation and a fixed aperture during spot scanning proton therapy for brain treatment.

Authors:  Blake Smith; Edgar Gelover; Alexandra Moignier; Dongxu Wang; Ryan T Flynn; Liyong Lin; Maura Kirk; Tim Solberg; Daniel E Hyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Trimmer sequencing time minimization during dynamically collimated proton therapy using a colony of cooperating agents.

Authors:  Blake R Smith; Daniel E Hyer; Ryan T Flynn; Patrick M Hill; Wesley S Culberson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The radiation response of cells from 9L gliosarcoma tumours is correlated with [F18]-EF5 uptake.

Authors:  Cameron J Koch; Anne L Shuman; Walter T Jenkins; Alexander V Kachur; Joel S Karp; Richard Freifelder; William R Dolbier; Sydney M Evans
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Dynamic rotating-shield brachytherapy.

Authors:  Yunlong Liu; Ryan T Flynn; Yusung Kim; Wenjun Yang; Xiaodong Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.