PURPOSE: Clinical studies concerning head and neck cancer patients treated with protons reporting on radiation-induced side effects are scarce. Therefore, we reviewed the literature regarding the potential benefits of protons compared with the currently used photons in terms of lower doses to normal tissue and the potential for fewer subsequent radiation-induced side effects, with the main focus on in silico planning comparative (ISPC) studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed by two independent researchers on ISPC studies that included proton-based and photon-based irradiation techniques. RESULTS: Initially, 877 papers were retrieved and 14 relevant and eligible ISPC studies were identified and included in this review. Four studies included paranasal sinus cancer cases, three included nasopharyngeal cancer cases, and seven included oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and/or laryngeal cancer cases. Seven studies compared the most sophisticated photon and proton techniques: intensity-modulated photon therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Four studies compared different proton techniques. All studies showed that protons had a lower normal tissue dose, while keeping similar or better target coverage. Two studies found that these lower doses theoretically translated into a significantly lower incidence of salivary dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The results of ISPC studies indicate that protons have the potential for a significantly lower normal tissue dose, while keeping similar or better target coverage. Scanned IMPT probably offers the most advantage and will allow for a substantially lower probability of radiation-induced side effects. The results of these ISPC studies should be confirmed in properly designed clinical trials.
PURPOSE: Clinical studies concerning head and neck cancerpatients treated with protons reporting on radiation-induced side effects are scarce. Therefore, we reviewed the literature regarding the potential benefits of protons compared with the currently used photons in terms of lower doses to normal tissue and the potential for fewer subsequent radiation-induced side effects, with the main focus on in silico planning comparative (ISPC) studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed by two independent researchers on ISPC studies that included proton-based and photon-based irradiation techniques. RESULTS: Initially, 877 papers were retrieved and 14 relevant and eligible ISPC studies were identified and included in this review. Four studies included paranasal sinus cancer cases, three included nasopharyngeal cancer cases, and seven included oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and/or laryngeal cancer cases. Seven studies compared the most sophisticated photon and proton techniques: intensity-modulated photon therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Four studies compared different proton techniques. All studies showed that protons had a lower normal tissue dose, while keeping similar or better target coverage. Two studies found that these lower doses theoretically translated into a significantly lower incidence of salivary dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The results of ISPC studies indicate that protons have the potential for a significantly lower normal tissue dose, while keeping similar or better target coverage. Scanned IMPT probably offers the most advantage and will allow for a substantially lower probability of radiation-induced side effects. The results of these ISPC studies should be confirmed in properly designed clinical trials.
Authors: B Emami; J Lyman; A Brown; L Coia; M Goitein; J E Munzenrider; B Shank; L J Solin; M Wesson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1991-05-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Blake Smith; Edgar Gelover; Alexandra Moignier; Dongxu Wang; Ryan T Flynn; Liyong Lin; Maura Kirk; Tim Solberg; Daniel E Hyer Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Steven J Frank; James D Cox; Michael Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Randal S Weber; Merrill S Kies; Jan S Lewin; Mark F Munsell; Matthew B Palmer; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaodong Zhang; Wei Liu; X Ronald Zhu Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-05-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Wencheng Zhang; Xiaodong Zhang; Pei Yang; Pierre Blanchard; Adam S Garden; Brandon Gunn; C David Fuller; Mark Chambers; Katherine A Hutcheson; Rong Ye; Stephen Y Lai; Mohamed Abdallah Sherif Radwan; X Ron Zhu; Steven J Frank Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Marc W Herr; Rosh K V Sethi; Joshua C Meier; Kyle J Chambers; Aaron Remenschneider; Annie Chan; William T Curry; Fred G Barker; Daniel G Deschler; Derrick T Lin Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2013-09-20