Stephen R Bowen1, Jatinder Saini2, Tobias R Chapman3, Robert S Miyaoka4, Paul E Kinahan4, George A Sandison3, Tony Wong2, Hubert J Vesselle4, Matthew J Nyflot3, Smith Apisarnthanarax3. 1. University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle, USA; University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, USA. Electronic address: srbowen@uw.edu. 2. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, USA. 3. University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle, USA. 4. University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a novel planning concept that differentially redistributes RT dose away from functional liver regions as defined by (99m)Tc-sulphur colloid (SC) uptake on patient SPECT/CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten HCC patients with different Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores (A5-B9) underwent SC SPECT/CT scans in treatment position prior to RT that were registered to planning CT scans. Proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) therapy plans were optimized to deliver 37.5-60.0Gy (RBE) over 5-15 fractions using single field uniform dose technique robust to range and setup uncertainty. Photon volumetrically modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were optimized to the same prescribed dose and minimum target coverage. For both treatment modalities, differential hepatic avoidance RT (DHART) plans were generated to decrease dose to functional liver volumes (FLV) defined by a range of thresholds relative to maximum SC uptake (43-90%) in the tumor-subtracted liver. Radiation dose was redistributed away from regions of increased SC uptake in each FLV by linearly scaling mean dose objectives during PBS or VMAT optimization. DHART planning feasibility was assessed by a significantly negative Spearman's rank correlation (RS) between dose difference and SC uptake. Patient, tumor, and treatment planning characteristics were tested for association to DHART planning feasibility using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA. RESULTS: Compared to conventional plans, DHART plans achieved a 3% FLV dose reduction for every 10% SC uptake increase. DHART planning was feasible in the majority of patients with 60% of patients having RS<-0.5 (p<0.01, range -1.0 to 0.2) and was particularly effective in 30% of patients (RS<-0.9). Mean dose to FLV was reduced by up to 20% in these patients. Only fractionation regimen was associated with DHART planning feasibility: 15 fraction courses were more feasible than 5-6 fraction courses (RS<-0.93 vs. RS>-0.60, p<0.02). CONCLUSION: Differential avoidance of functional liver regions defined on sulphur colloid SPECT/CT is achievable with either photon VMAT or proton PBS therapy. Further investigation with phantom studies and in a larger cohort of patients may validate the utility of DHART planning for HCC radiotherapy.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a novel planning concept that differentially redistributes RT dose away from functional liver regions as defined by (99m)Tc-sulphur colloid (SC) uptake on patient SPECT/CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten HCC patients with different Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores (A5-B9) underwent SC SPECT/CT scans in treatment position prior to RT that were registered to planning CT scans. Proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) therapy plans were optimized to deliver 37.5-60.0Gy (RBE) over 5-15 fractions using single field uniform dose technique robust to range and setup uncertainty. Photon volumetrically modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were optimized to the same prescribed dose and minimum target coverage. For both treatment modalities, differential hepatic avoidance RT (DHART) plans were generated to decrease dose to functional liver volumes (FLV) defined by a range of thresholds relative to maximum SC uptake (43-90%) in the tumor-subtracted liver. Radiation dose was redistributed away from regions of increased SC uptake in each FLV by linearly scaling mean dose objectives during PBS or VMAT optimization. DHART planning feasibility was assessed by a significantly negative Spearman's rank correlation (RS) between dose difference and SC uptake. Patient, tumor, and treatment planning characteristics were tested for association to DHART planning feasibility using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA. RESULTS: Compared to conventional plans, DHART plans achieved a 3% FLV dose reduction for every 10% SC uptake increase. DHART planning was feasible in the majority of patients with 60% of patients having RS<-0.5 (p<0.01, range -1.0 to 0.2) and was particularly effective in 30% of patients (RS<-0.9). Mean dose to FLV was reduced by up to 20% in these patients. Only fractionation regimen was associated with DHART planning feasibility: 15 fraction courses were more feasible than 5-6 fraction courses (RS<-0.93 vs. RS>-0.60, p<0.02). CONCLUSION: Differential avoidance of functional liver regions defined on sulphur colloid SPECT/CT is achievable with either photon VMAT or proton PBS therapy. Further investigation with phantom studies and in a larger cohort of patients may validate the utility of DHART planning for HCC radiotherapy.
Authors: Fréderic Duprez; Wilfried De Neve; Werner De Gersem; Marc Coghe; Indira Madani Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-07-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mike E Robbins; Judy K Brunso-Bechtold; Ann M Peiffer; Christina I Tsien; Janet E Bailey; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Wouter van Elmpt; Dirk De Ruysscher; Anke van der Salm; Annemarie Lakeman; Judith van der Stoep; Daisy Emans; Eugène Damen; Michel Öllers; Jan-Jakob Sonke; José Belderbos Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-04-06 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Sarah M McGuire; Sumin Zhou; Lawrence B Marks; Mark Dewhirst; Fang-Fang Yin; Shiva K Das Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Eunsin Lee; Jing Zeng; Robert S Miyaoka; Jatinder Saini; Paul E Kinahan; George A Sandison; Tony Wong; Hubert J Vesselle; Ramesh Rengan; Stephen R Bowen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Victor W Wu; Marina A Epelman; Hesheng Wang; H Edwin Romeijn; Mary Feng; Yue Cao; Randall K Ten Haken; Martha M Matuszak Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Stephanie K Schaub; Pehr E Hartvigson; Michael I Lock; Morten Høyer; Thomas B Brunner; Higinia R Cardenes; Laura A Dawson; Edward Y Kim; Nina A Mayr; Simon S Lo; Smith Apisarnthanarax Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-01-01
Authors: Stephen R Bowen; Tobias R Chapman; Joshua Borgman; Robert S Miyaoka; Paul E Kinahan; Iris W Liou; George A Sandison; Hubert J Vesselle; Matthew J Nyflot; Smith Apisarnthanarax Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Kevin P Labadie; Stephanie K Schaub; Derek Khorsand; Guy Johnson; Smith Apisarnthanarax; James O Park Journal: World J Hepatol Date: 2019-01-27