Literature DB >> 9402895

Activation of duration-sensitive auditory cortical fields in humans.

C Alain1, D L Woods, D Covarrubias.   

Abstract

The influence of stimulus duration on auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) was examined for tones varying randomly in duration, location, and frequency in an auditory selective attention task. Stimulus duration effects were isolated as duration difference waves by subtracting AEPs to short duration tones from AEPs to longer duration tones of identical location, frequency and rise time. This analysis revealed that AEP components generally increased in amplitude and decreased in latency with increments in signal duration, with evidence of longer temporal integration times for lower frequency tones. Different temporal integration functions were seen for different N1 subcomponents. The results suggest that different auditory cortical areas have different temporal integration times, and that these functions vary as a function of tone frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9402895     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00057-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  11 in total

1.  Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; John H Mills; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; John H Mills; Ning-Ji He; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Cortical pitch response components index stimulus onset/offset and dynamic features of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Frequency changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Henry J Michalewski; Fan-Gang Zeng; Hillel Pratt; Arnold Starr
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Tina M Penman; Garnett P McMillan; Emily M Ellis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Reward contingencies and the recalibration of task monitoring and reward systems: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  K P Morie; P De Sanctis; J J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  ERP evidence for the recognition of emotional prosody through simulated cochlear implant strategies.

Authors:  Deepashri Agrawal; Lydia Timm; Filipa Campos Viola; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Neural response during temporal - and spatial luminance contrast processing and its manifestation in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent-signal in striate and extra-striate cortex.

Authors:  Valentine L Marcar; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 1.703

9.  Age differences in the neuroelectric adaptation to meaningful sounds.

Authors:  Ada W S Leung; Yu He; Cheryl L Grady; Claude Alain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Auditory processing in fragile x syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah E Rotschafer; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 5.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.